Proposal and Assessment of a Combined Cooling and Power System Based on the Regenerative Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Brayton Cycle Integrated with an Absorption Refrigeration Cycle for Engine Waste Heat Recovery
Chuang Wu,Xiaoxiao Xu,Qibin Li,Jun Li,Shunsen Wang,Chao Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112527
IF: 10.4
2020-01-01
Energy Conversion and Management
Abstract:This paper proposes a novel combined cooling and power (CCP) system based on a regenerative supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle (sCO(2) cycle) and an ammonia-water absorption refrigeration cycle (ARC) for engine waste heat recovery. In the proposed system, the supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle absorbs the waste heat of the internal combustion engine to generate power, and the absorption refrigeration cycle utilizes the low-grade energy in the supercritical carbon dioxide turbine exhaust to provide cooling. Firstly, energy and exergy analysis is performed on the combined cooling and power system. Then, detailed parametric analysis is carried out to study the effects of key parameters, such as the compressor outlet pressure, turbine inlet temperature, generator hot-end temperature difference, and evaporator temperature on the exergy efficiency and total product unit cost. Finally, the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II is adopted for multi-objective optimization to obtain the maximum exergy efficiency and the minimum total product unit cost. Multi-objective optimization results reveal that better thermodynamic and economic performances can be obtained by lowering the evaporator temperature. Compared with the single regenerative supercritical carbon dioxide system, the proposed system can increase the exergy efficiency by 2.29-2.54%pt (percentage point), and the thermal efficiency by 8.16-18.93%pt, but might increase the total product unit cost. Under different evaporator temperatures (-10-10 degrees C), the proposed system can generate 248.19-253.90 kW of net power output, accounting for 8.48-8.67% of the rated power output of the engine, and produce 70.57-168.86 kW of cooling capacity by consuming 0.445-0.532 kW of pump work. In addition, exergy destruction analyses indicate that the components in the bottoming ARC generally have less exergy destructions.