Abstract:Copy number variations (CNVs) are gain and loss of DNA sequence of a genome. High throughput platforms such as microarrays and next generation sequencing technologies (NGS) have been applied for genome wide copy number losses. Although progress has been made in both approaches, the accuracy and consistency of CNV calling from the two platforms remain in dispute. In this study, we perform a deep analysis on copy number losses on 254 human DNA samples, which have both SNP microarray data and NGS data publicly available from Hapmap Project and 1000 Genomes Project respectively. We show that the copy number losses reported from Hapmap Project and 1000 Genome Project only have < 30% overlap, while these reports are required to have cross-platform (e.g. PCR, microarray and high-throughput sequencing) experimental supporting by their corresponding projects, even though state-of-art calling methods were employed. On the other hand, copy number losses are found directly from HapMap microarray data by an accurate algorithm, i.e. CNVhac, almost all of which have lower read mapping depth in NGS data; furthermore, 88% of which can be supported by the sequences with breakpoint in NGS data. Our results suggest the ability of microarray calling CNVs and the possible introduction of false negatives from the unessential requirement of the additional cross-platform supporting. The inconsistency of CNV reports from Hapmap Project and 1000 Genomes Project might result from the inadequate information containing in microarray data, the inconsistent detection criteria, or the filtration effect of cross-platform supporting. The statistical test on CNVs called from CNVhac show that the microarray data can offer reliable CNV reports, and majority of CNV candidates can be confirmed by raw sequences. Therefore, the CNV candidates given by a good caller could be highly reliable without cross-platform supporting, so additional experimental information should be applied in need instead of necessarily.

Genome-Wide Copy Number Variation Detection Using NGS: Data Analysis and Interpretation.

Accuracy Of Cnv Detection From Gwas Data

Detection of Genome-Wide Copy Number Variants in Myeloid Malignancies Using Next-Generation Sequencing

SeqCNV: a Novel Method for Identification of Copy Number Variations in Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Data

Evaluation of tools for identifying large copy number variations from ultra-low-coverage whole-genome sequencing data

Evaluation of Copy Number Variant Detection from Panel‐based Next‐generation Sequencing Data

Evaluation of somatic copy number variation detection by NGS technologies and bioinformatics tools on a hyper-diploid cancer genome

A Single Cell Level Based Method For Copy Number Variation Analysis By Low Coverage Massively Parallel Sequencing

Common Copy Number Variation Detection From Multiple Sequenced Samples

A Remark on Copy Number Variation Detection Methods

Copy Number Variation Detection In Whole-Genome Sequencing Data Using The Bayesian Information Criterion

DL-CNV: A Deep Learning Method for Identifying Copy Number Variations Based on Next Generation Target Sequencing

CNV-TV: A Robust Method to Discover Copy Number Variation from Short Sequencing Reads

Using SAAS-CNV to Detect and Characterize Somatic Copy Number Alterations in Cancer Genomes from Next Generation Sequencing and SNP Array Data

A Survey of Copy‐Number Variation Detection Tools Based on High‐Throughput Sequencing Data

Comprehensive Assessment of Somatic Copy Number Variation Calling Using Next-Generation Sequencing Data

Copy Number Analysis Of Whole-Genome Data Using Bic-Seq2 And Its Application To Detection Of Cancer Susceptibility Variants

Performance of Copy Number Variants Detection Based on Whole-Genome Sequencing by DNBSEQ Platforms

Copy‐Number Variants Detection by Low‐Pass Whole‐Genome Sequencing

Copy number variation estimation from multiple next-generation sequencing samples.

Genome-wide copy number analysis of single cells