Comparison of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt for Treatment of Variceal Bleeding in Patients with Cirrhosis with or Without Spontaneous Portosystemic Shunt

Xiafei Leng,Feng Zhang,Ming Zhang,Huiwen Guo,Xiaochun Yin,Jiangqiang Xiao,Yi Wang,Xiaoping Zou,Yuzheng Zhuge
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/meg.0000000000001349
2019-01-01
European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Abstract:Background and aims Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an effective intervention for portal hypertensive complications in cirrhosis. Spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSSs) may increase the risk of post-TIPS complications and mortality. This study was done to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TIPS for treating variceal bleeding between patients with and without SPSSs. Patients and methods The clinical data of 467 consecutive patients with cirrhosis who received TIPS for variceal bleeding from January 2012 to January 2018 were screened. A total of 33 patients with coexisting SPSSs were included as the SPSS group, and 33 patients without SPSSs were randomly selected as control. The procedure-related complications and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results Both groups were successfully treated with TIPS. SPSSs were antegradely embolized before TIPS placement. In terms of safety, one patient in the SPSS group experienced an asymptomatic pulmonary embolism, and another patient experienced serious gastric ulcer bleeding. Overall, 23 (70.0%) patients in the SPSS group and 16 (51.5%) patients in the control group experienced different mild complications (P=0.131). During a median follow-up of more than 2 years, the rebleeding rates (7.1 vs. 3.7% at 1 year, P=0.508), overt hepatic encephalopathy occurrence rates (34.4 vs. 39.4% at 2 years, P=0.685), and orthotopic liver transplantation-free survival rates (73.2 vs. 70.7% at 2 years, P=0.557) were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion TIPS combined with antegrade embolization is safe, effective, and feasible for patients with SPSSs, with safety and long-term outcomes comparable to patients without SPSSs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?