Abstract:Ambidextrous leadership is key to solving organizational tension and complex problems. This type of leadership has gained attention in the field of organizational behavior in recent years. Ambidextrous leadership refers to a set of two complementary leadership behaviors and the flexibility switch between two different behaviors. Existing studies noted the extensive benefits of ambidextrous leadership to employees and organizations. These advantages include enhancement of the psychological empowerment of employees, exploratory and exploitative behaviors, innovation, and organizational change. Prior studies focused on ambidextrous leadership from the Western context. These studies include opening-closing leadership and transformational-transactional leadership. However, the consequences of indigenous ambidextrous leadership in the Chinese context remain poorly understood. A particular ambidextrous leadership embedded in Chinese culture was identified, namely, authoritarian-benevolent leadership. The present study focuses on the combination of authoritarian and benevolent leadership, which is regarded as a type of indigenous ambidextrous leadership. The researchers aimed to investigate the effect of different combination modes of benevolent and authoritarian leadership on the work outcome of subordinates and its underlying mechanism. The researchers identified four scenarios by combining the two kinds of leadership, namely, high authority-high benevolence, low authority-low benevolence, high authority-low benevolence, low authority-high benevolence. This approach was based on the level of authoritarian and benevolent leadership. The former two forms of leadership fall under the congruence category, whereas the latter two fall under the incongruence category. By drawing on followership theory, the researchers expected that the active implementation of subordinates was high when leaders were at a high level of authoritarian leadership and benevolent leadership than when at a low level of authoritarian leadership and benevolent leadership. The researchers also found that the active implementation of subordinates was high when the benevolent leadership of leaders exceeded authoritarian leadership rather than when authoritarian leadership exceeded benevolent leadership. Third, the active implementation of subordinates carried the joint effect of benevolent and authority leadership to the job performance of followers. A multiwave, multiresource survey was used to test the hypotheses. Surveys were given to 204 voluntary subordinates at Time 1. They were required to report their leaders' benevolent leadership and authoritarian leadership and demographic information. The researchers obtained 183 effective survey responses. After one month, the researchers conducted Time 2 survey, which required leaders to rate the job performance of their subordinates. The subordinates were then required to rate their active implementation. A total of 130 effective survey responses were obtained. The researchers used polynomial regression combined with response surface analysis based on the two-wave data. The results supported the hypotheses. The findings offered several contributions to literature. First, different combination modes of benevolent and authoritarian leadership have different effects on the work outcome of subordinates. Second, the researchers uncovered the dynamics between authoritarian-benevolent leadership and work outcome of subordinates. These findings can aid Chinese scholars to gain an improved understanding of indigenous ambidextrous leadership. These findings advance the understanding on how authoritarian leadership combined with benevolent leadership affects the performance of followers. The findings also provide further practical insights to practitioners.

Paradoxical Leadership Incongruence and Chinese Individuals’ Followership Behaviors: Moderation Effects of Hierarchical Culture and Perceived Strength of Human Resource Management System

Paradoxical Leader Behaviors in People Management: Antecedents and Consequences

Leader UPB and Follower Unethical Behavior: Integrating Relational and Moral Perspectives

Does Paradoxical Leadership Facilitate Leaders' Task Performance? A Perspective of Self-Regulation Theory.

Why Do Employees Perform Better Under Paradoxical Leaders? The Mediating Role of Group Harmony

How Do Leaders Cope with the Paradoxical Situations? the Development of Paradoxical Leadership

Leader-Follower Congruence in Proactive Personality and Work Outcomes: the Mediating Role of Leader-Member Exchange

Paradoxical leadership, team adaptation and team performance: The mediating role of inclusive climate

Paradoxical leadership and employee innovation: Organization-based self-esteem and harmonious passion as sequential mediators

Paradoxical Leadership:A Literature Review and Prospects

Authoritarian-benevolent Leadership, Active Implementation and Job Performance: an Investigation on the Effectiveness of Ambidextrous Leadership in the Chinese Context

Humility Harmonized? Exploring Whether and How Leader and Employee Humility (In)Congruence Influences Employee Citizenship and Deviance Behaviors

Balancing employees' extrinsic requirements and intrinsic motivation: A paradoxical leader behaviour perspective

The effects of leader–subordinate power distance orientation congruence on employees' taking charge behaviors in China: a moderated mediation model

Participative Leadership and the Organizational Commitment of Civil Servants in China: the Mediating Effects of Trust in Supervisor

Research on the Influence of Paradoxical Leadership on Compulsory Organizational Citizenship Behavior

Co-frequency resonance: the effect of leader-follower psychological capital congruence on employee innovative behaviour

The Relationship Between Ethical Leadership and Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior: Linear or Curvilinear Effects?

Ethical Leadership, but Toward Whom? How Moral Identity Congruence Shapes the Ethical Treatment of Employees

We May Be Different, but I Can Help You

Both a curse and a blessing? A social cognitive approach to the paradoxical effects of leader narcissism