Abstract:Abstract This paper initiates development of a set of stylized facts concerning the structure of public support for national agricultural research systems (NARS) within a neoclassical political economy framework. The aim is to place public funding of NARS in the broader context of the overall level of direct government assistance to agriculture. Using a newly constructed data set on NARS expenditures over the 1970‐85 period, we observe a growing disparity in agricultural research intensity ratios, which measure the level of public support for NARS in relation to agricultural gross domestic production (Ag gdp ) between low and high‐income countries. This growing disparity appears to be driven by much larger increases in support for agricultural research by high‐income countries, coupled with a significantly slower growth in the size of their agricultural sector, despite the propensity of low and middle‐income countries to increase real support to agricultural research. As per‐capita incomes rise the public agricultural expenditure ratio, which measures public expenditures on agriculture relative to the size of the agricultural sector, Ag gdp , increases substantially. Public expenditures on agriculture were indexed on agricultural and non‐agricultural populations to give a rough indication of the increasing incentives for rural 'distributional coalitions' to seek a redistribution of public expenditures in their favor. A relative research expenditure ( rre ) ratio is developed, which measures the proportion of total public expenditure on agriculture spent on agricultural research. It provides an indication of the relative importance given to research on agriculture within the constraints imposed by overall public spending on agriculture. In contrast to the agricultural research intensity ratios, the rre ratios suggest that agricultural research appears to command as large a share of the public purse devoted to agriculture in low and middle‐income countries as it does in high‐income countries. Expectations derived from the neoclassical political economy literature that research may have fared relatively better in high compared with low‐income countries were not supported by the data.

Public Investments in and for Agriculture

The Impact of Public Expenditure and International Trade on Agricultural Productivity in China

An Empirical Study On Agriculture Financial Input Relates to Peasants' Income Increase

Financing agricultural research: International investment patterns and policy perspectives

Impact of investments in agricultural innovation on food security in sub-Saharan Africa

Emerging Trends in the Public and Private Investment in Agricultural Research in India

Structure of Public Support for National Agricultural Research Systems: A Political Economy Perspective

Agricultural infrastructure public financing towards rural poverty alleviation: evidence from West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU) States

Impact of Agricultural R&D on Sectoral Economic Growth

Agricultural Insurance and Economic Development

Assessing investment priorities for inclusive agricultural transformation in Tanzania

Rural and agricultural subsidies in Latin America: Development costs of misallocated public resources

Doing Development-Oriented Agronomy: Rethinking Methods, Concepts And Direction

Public Investment in Agricultural R&D and Extension

Assistance to expand agricultural production

Expanding access to agricultural inputs in Africa: a review of recent market development experience

Environmental Economics and Agricultural Policy

STUDY ON THE INVESTMENT APPROACHES OF RURAL REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN CHINA

Agricultural R&D, technology and productivity

Agricultural and Rural Development in China During the Past Four Decades: an Introduction

Agriculture for Improved Nutrition: The Current Research Landscape