The Hierarchical Relationship Between the Relational-Self and the Collective-Self During Attention Processing
Yingcan Zheng,Zilun Xiao,Xin Zhou,Zhuoya Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S349074
IF: 3.974
2022-03-05
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Abstract:Yingcan Zheng, 1 Zilun Xiao, 2 Xin Zhou, 2 Zhuoya Yang 3 1 Developmental Psychology for Armyman, Department of Medical Psychology, Army Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China; 2 School of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China; 3 Basic Psychology, Department of Medical Psychology, Army Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Yingcan Zheng, Army Medical University, Shapingba, Chongqing, 400038, People's Republic of China, Tel +86 15086842695, Fax +86 23-68771779, Email Zilun Xiao, Southwest University, Beibei, Chongqing, 400715, People's Republic of China, Tel +86 18108788177, Email Background: Under the Chinese collectivist cultural system, people emphasize social connections with close others and members of in-groups. Collectivism can be divided into the following two forms: relational collectivism (privileges relational self [RS]) and group collectivism (emphasizes collective self [CS]). Previous researchers have found a hierarchy between the RS and CS, resulting in different degrees of recognition advantages. However, the hierarchy between the RS and CS is unclear and may depend on the specific processing stage. Therefore, this research compared the hierarchy between these two selves during different processing stages using an eye-movement method. Methods: The sample consisted of thirty-eight young adults aged between 18 and 24 years old (M = 20.45, SD= 1.62). Each participant finished a dot-probe task featuring high-relevant (HR, ie one's mother's name and China) and low-relevant (LR, ie, name of a famous person and USA) information about the RS and CS and neutral information. Further, the eye-movement (EM) indices were collected simultaneously. Results: A stronger reaction time bias and longer total gaze duration revealed that young people in China focus more on RS information, indicating that Chinese people prioritize the RS over the CS at late stages of attentional processing. Conclusion: Information on interpersonal relationships and information on the in-group both catch people's attention quickly and easily, but only RS information can maintain attention for longer. Understanding the hierarchy of the RS and the CS may provide more evidence for self-construal in the Chinese collectivist cultural context. The importance of the RS prompting that the interpersonal and close relationships are more important to the development of the self, suggesting that it is necessary to pay more attention to the impact of interpersonal support on people's mental health in clinical applications. Keywords: relational self, collective self, attentional bias, hierarchical relationship, self-prioritization Under the Chinese collectivist cultural system, people emphasize social connections with close others and members of in-groups. Based on these two kinds of social connections, collectivism can be divided into the following two forms: relational collectivism and group collectivism. 1 Relational collectivism emphasizes interpersonal relationships with close others, that is, the relational self (RS). Group collectivism privileges depersonalized social relationships with one's in-group, that is, the collective self (CS). 2,3 Previous evidence has indicated that the RS and CS coexist in every individual, but humans show different hierarchies between RS and CS under a variety of context, as reflected in the differences in self-bias during different processing. 2–4 Self-bias affects most information processing during our daily lives, such as attention, cognition, memory, and motivation. However, the hierarchy of RS and CS during different processing has not yet been made clear in previous research. Under the collectivist cultural background, whether Chinese people emphasis individual interpersonal relationship or network relationships within an in group is a problem that needs to be clarified. We aim to determine which kind of these two selves can attract people's attention more readily, which may provide evidence for the collectivist cultural tendency in China. Researchers have investigated the hierarchy between RS and CS during a number of processing (eg memory, motivation, attitude), however there has not been consistent conclusions. 2–6 In former subjective assessment researches, 7–9 the participants were asked to compare the importance of three types of self (individual, relational, and collective). Researchers have found that people placed greater emphasis on RS than CS in both individualist and collectivist cultures. Researchers in Poland also found that young people diagnosed in 2018 were characterized by a greater preference fo -Abstract Truncated-
psychology, clinical, multidisciplinary