Abstract:It has now been widely acknowledged that both accuracy and fluency should be the ideal goals of language teaching. The field of TEFL is now witnessing strong interests in the idea of seeking a balance between meaning and form in instruction and accordingly accuracy and fluency in students' production. Much literature has been devoted to the theoretical and practical concerns of fluency and the research on accuracy remains a fertile but unexplored field. With the information processing model of language learning as a departure, the present study explores the influences of task complexity, task difficulty and proficiency level on Chinese students' accurate performance in communication and their interactional effects. Forty-eight subjects from Zhejiang University, all freshmen and non-English majors, participated in the research. They were at different levels of proficiency in English. There were two between-subject factors (Processing condition and Proficiency level) and one within-subject factor (task type) in the design. Effects of task complexity on accuracy were studied from two different perspectives: we studied task complexity owing to inherent task structure, content or condition and the variable was indicated by three task types; we also investigated the effects of manipulating task complexity and the factor was opera-tionalized as two performance conditions: planning and no planning. Subjects were divided into small groups, with four in each. Half of the groups were randomly assigned to planning condition and half to no planning condition. Each group had to do all the three tasks. While completing the tasks, subjects under both conditions were audio taped. Immediately following performance of each task, subjects were asked to complete a brief questionnaire composed of five items. Responses to these five items were used to measure learner perceptions of task difficulty. All the quantitative data were processed by SPSS for windows 10. ANOVAs, Correlations and Linear Regression analyses were used respectively to analyze the relationships between the variables and the interactions between them. The significance level was set at . 05 level. Some quantitative data were also collected to answer the call for triangulation. The findings of the study show that task complexity does exert considerable influences on accuracy and accuracy is in reverse relationship with task complexity, with more complex tasks resulting in lower accuracy. Proficiency level has a prevalent impact on accuracy, with learners at higher levels producing more accurate language, but there is no significant interaction between proficiency level and task complexity. Subjects, in spite of their proficiency levels, achieve higher accuracy in less complex tasks and participants at higher proficiency levels consistently produce more accurate language in any task. Some affective factors contributing to task difficulty are correlated with accuracy, among which perception of overall difficulty and stress are most prominent. They are both significantly negatively correlated with accuracy. In addition to planning, task structure and task condition are found to be relevant to task complexity.

The Individual Study of Error Correction on German Students

Analysis and Correction of English Language Learners’ Errors

EFL Students' Preferences for Written Corrective Feedback: Do Error Types, Language Proficiency, and Foreign Language Enjoyment Matter?

A comparison between the preferences for oral corrective feedback of teachers and students of Chinese as a second language

Correction of Speaking Mistakes when Learning a Foreign Language - Analysis of the Most Common Mistakes and their Correction in Learning the German Language

Peer versus teacher corrections through electronic learning communities and face-to-face classroom interactions and EFL learners' passion for learning, speaking fluency, and accuracy

A Study on Error Analysis of Localizer for Korean Learners of Chinese Language: Focusing on Error judgment and Error correction of Teachers

An Investigation of Syntactic Errors in Chinese Undergraduate EFL Learners’ Compositions: A Cohort Study

Determining Efficient Post-writing Activity for Error Correction: Self-editing, Peer review, or Teacher Feedback?

Investigating EFL Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices about Written Corrective Feedback: A Large-scale Study

The Influence of Task Complexity, Task Difficulty and Proficiency Level on Chinese Students' Accuracy in Performance

Paragraph-level Errors in Chinese Undergraduate EFL Learners‘ Compositions: A Cohort Study

A cross-cultural comparison in pedagogical beliefs about oral corrective feedback: the case of English language teachers in China versus the U.S.

Instructors' Debate over Error Feedback on Chinese International Students' Academic Writings in A U.S. University

Investigating English Language Learners’ Beliefs about Oral Corrective Feedback at Chinese Universities: a Large-Scale Survey

The relative effects of implicit and explicit corrective feedback on the acquisition of 3rd person -s by Chinese university students: A classroom-based study

Face values: the use of sensitive error correction to address adolescents' ‘face’ issues in the modern languages classroom

Medical School Students’ Preferences for and Perceptions of Teacher Written Corrective Feedback on English as a Second Language Academic Writing: An Intrinsic Case Study

Understanding individual differences in lower-proficiency students’ engagement with teacher written corrective feedback

An examination of Chinese character writing errors: Developmental differences among Chinese as a foreign language learners

How Learners’ Corrective Feedback Beliefs Modulate Their Oral Accuracy: A Comparative Study on High- and Low-Accuracy Learners of Chinese As a Second Language