Abstract:To the Editor: I read the recent paper by Williamson and Hocken with interest (1). However, I believe there is a logical reason as to why there is a discrepancy between internet prevalence and population prevalence of certain cancers. In the study the authors identified overrepresentation of kidney, stomach and breast cancers and underrepresentation of colorectal, nonHodgkin lymphoma and oesophageal cancers. Collectively, the overrepresented cancers tend to affect younger people compared with the underrepresented cancers. Data from Cancer Research UK show that 81% of breast cancer and 95% of stomach cancer occur in people aged more than 50 years (2). While the highest incidence rates of kidney cancer occur in the over 75 years, notably incidence rates already start to increase in those over 40 years (2). On the other hand, 84% of colorectal cancer, 70% of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and 80% of oesophageal cancer occur in people aged more than 60 years (2). The Office of National Statistics (ONS) published an ‘Internet Access’ survey in 2010 (3). The report states that 80% of 45–54 year olds, 74% of 55–64 year olds and 59% of over 65 year olds used the internet daily or nearly daily in 2010. On a similar trend, 84, 72 and 32% of 45–54 year olds, 55–64 year olds and over 65 year olds, respectively, last used the internet 3 months ago or less. While there are particular difficulties in comparing these two sets of data, for example the age categories do not match perfectly, the conclusion we can draw is that patients who tend to have been afflicted by low internet prevalence cancers tend to be older, and as a result are less likely to use the internet. Furthermore, it appears that younger people are more likely to ‘post messages to chat sites, social networking sites [or] blogs’ (31% of 45–54 year olds, 19% of 55–64 year olds, 8% of over 65 year olds) and ‘upload self-created content to be shared’ (28% of 45–54 year olds, 29% of 55–64 year olds, 22% of over 65 year olds) (3). This in turn could fuel the increased number of search engine hits for high internet prevalence cancers. Moreover, organisations may respond to the likelihood of higher internet use by younger cancer patients by pooling more resources into web pages about cancers they are more likely to suffer from. These trends are also documented elsewhere. Younger patients are more likely to turn to the internet compared with older patients, whether for help with treatment decisions or cancer-related information (4,5). Overall, breast cancer patients were most likely to use the internet for cancer resources (5). There are caveats to consider: first this is a gross generalisation, as the ONS data is taken from a sample of the general population. Secondly, there are confounding factors such as socioeconomic class which also have an impact on internet use. Thirdly, the internet is a global resource hence any potential impact in increasing webpage results by UK cancer patients need evaluation. Despite these limitations, the results seen in Williamson and Hocken’s paper appear to be a reflection of cancer demographics. Further confirmation could be obtained from internet usage surveys in cancer patients and comparing this with cancer internet prevalence data.

Clinical study on preoperative oral carbohydrate for patients performed gastric neoplasms resection

Effects of Preoperative Oral Carbohydrate on Cirrhotic Patients under Endoscopic Therapy with Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Effects Of Preoperative Oral Carbohydrates On Patients Undergoing Esd Surgery Under General Anesthesia A Randomized Control Study

Effect of preoperative oral complex carbohydrate drinks on postoperative gastrointestinal function in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery

Gastric residual volume, safety, and effectiveness of drinking 250 mL of glucose solution 2-3 hours before surgery in gastric cancer patients: a multicenter, single-blind, randomized-controlled trial

Preoperative Oral Carbohydrate Administration Can Ameliorate Perioperative Stress and Metabolism for Patients with Surgical Thoracic Oncology

Effects of Perioperative Sequential Treatment on Recovery of Patients with Esophageal or Cardiac Carcinoma

Preoperative oral carbohydrates in elderly patients undergoing free flap surgery for oral cancer: randomized controlled trial

Preoperative Carbohydrate Loading with Individualized Supplemental Insulin in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Randomized Trial

Effect of preoperative oral high glucose solution on postoperative recovery, HOMA-IR and serum hsCRP level of patients with gastric cancer

A randomized trial of preoperative oral carbohydrates in abdominal surgery

Effectiveness and Safety of Preoperative Oral Carbohydrates in Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocols for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review

Preoperative Carbohydrate Loading in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Pilot Randomized Trial

Comparison of Gastric Residual Volume After Ingestion of A Carbohydrate Drink and Water in Healthy Volunteers with Obesity: A Randomized Crossover Study

Internet use

Efficacy of the Oral Administration of Maltodextrin Fructose Before Major Abdominal Surgery: A Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Study

Effects of preoperative carbohydrate loading on recovery after elective surgery: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effects of Preoperative Carbohydrate and Non-carbohydrate Loading on Gastric Emptying in Diabetic and Non-diabetic Patients Posted for Elective Surgery

The safety of preoperative carbohydrate drinks in extremely elderly patients assessed by gastric ultrasonography: a randomized controlled trial

The Effects of Preoperative Oral Carbohydrate on Frequency of T and NK Cells in Patients with Cervical Cancer Treated Using Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study

Effects of preoperative oral administration of glucose solution combined with postoperative probiotics on inflammation and intestinal barrier function in patients after colorectal cancer surgery