Investigation and factors analysis of 331 cases of transfusion-related adverse reactions in pediatric patients

yin mingwei,xu jun,ceng zhi,jin xiaobo,chen xuejun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13303/j.cjbt.issn.1004-549x.2018.02.025
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective In order to provide clinical data for the reduction of transfusion-related adverse reactions( TRARs),the incidence and influence factors of TRARs were analyzed in this study. Methods This retrospective study was conducted to examine all the transfusion related adverse events from Jan. 2015 to Dec. 2016,including the incidence and types of TRARs,different transfusion components and influence factors. Results During this period,331 cases with adverse transfusion events were reported among a total of 37 652 transfusion cases( 86 175 treatments),the incidence of adverse transfusion reactions was 0. 88%. Febrile non-hemolytic transfusion reactions( FNHTRs) accounted for 83. 08%( 275/331),allergic transfusion reactions( ATRs) accounted for 14. 80%( 49/331),FNHTRs combined ATRs accounted for0. 30%( 1/331),and others accounted for 1. 81%( 6/331). The incidence rates of adverse transfusion events with different transfusion components were 0. 11%( 15/13 320),0. 99%( 185/18 776),0. 25%( 3/1 329),3. 04%( 128/4 217),0( 0/10),for plasma,red cell concentrated( RCCs),washed RBC( WRBC),apheresis platelet,and cryoprecipitate,respectively. Univariate analysis showed that the factors impacting transfusion reactions were age,primary disease,transfusion components and the number of blood transfusion( P < 0. 05); Binary multiple factors regression analysis revealed that age,transfusion components and the number of blood transfusion are independent risk factors for adverse transfusion reactions( P<0. 05). Conclusion The major TRARs are FNHTRs and ATRs among children. The highest incidence rate of TRARs was transfusion with apheresis platelet in all transfusion components. Age,transfusion components and the number of blood transfusion are independent risk factors for TRARs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?