A Randomized Clinical Trial of Intravenous Methylprednisolone with 2 Protocols in Patients with Graves Orbitopathy.
Zhangfang Li,Yaosheng Luo,Quandi Huang,Zhi Chen,Dandan Song,Daoyan Pan,Shidi Hu,Wei Jiang,Qiuyue Cai,Xiaoting Feng,Qing Zhang,Chanyan Weng,Qiang Zhong,Tongfeng Zhao,Chenzhong Li,Tong Zhang,Jie Shen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgad476
2024-01-01
Abstract:CONTEXT:Intravenous glucocorticoid (IVGC) is an accessible and affordable treatment for Graves orbitopathy (GO); the 4.5-g protocol is well studied, but many details of treatment protocols need to be clarified.OBJECTIVE:To compare the efficacy and safety of weekly and monthly protocol of IVGC in GO.METHODS:A prospective, randomized, observer-masked, single-center clinical trial, followed up to week 24, at the third affiliated hospital of Southern Medical University; 58 patients with active and moderate to severe GO, aged 18-60 years old, who had not received relevant treatment were included. The intervention was weekly protocol or monthly protocol of IVGC; both received a cumulative dose of methylprednisolone 4.5 g and had a duration of 12 weeks. The overall effective rate, improvement of quality of life (QOL) and signal intensity ratio (SIR) were measured.RESULTS:There was no significant difference in the effective rate between the 2 groups at week 12 and week 24 (86.21% vs 72.41%, P = .195; 86.21% vs 82.61%, P = .441), there was no significant difference in the improvement of clinical activity score, exophthalmos, soft tissue involvement, diplopia, and QOL. At week 24, the mean SIR and maximum SIR of the 2 groups were lower than those before treatment, and there were no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the 2 groups (31.03% vs 27.59%, P = .773).CONCLUSION:The efficacy and safety of the 2 protocols are comparable; the monthly protocol could be used as an alternative to the weekly protocol.