Abstract:BACKGROUND: Network-based interventions against epidemic spread are most powerful when the full network structure is known. However, in practice, resource constraints require decisions to be made based on partial network information. We investigated how the accuracy of network data available at individual and village levels affected network-based vaccination effectiveness.METHODS: We simulated a Susceptible-Infected-Recovered process on static empirical social networks from 75 rural Indian villages. First, we used regression analysis to predict the percentage of individuals ever infected (cumulative incidence) based on village-level network properties for simulated datasets from 10 representative villages. Second, we simulated vaccinating 10% of each of the 75 empirical village networks at baseline, selecting vaccinees through one of five network-based approaches: random individuals (Random); random contacts of random individuals (Nomination); random high-degree individuals (High Degree); highest degree individuals (Highest Degree); or most central individuals (Central). The first three approaches require only sample data; the latter two require full network data. We also simulated imposing a limit on how many contacts an individual can nominate (Fixed Choice Design, FCD), which reduces the data collection burden but generates only partially observed networks.RESULTS: In regression analysis, we found mean and standard deviation of the degree distribution to strongly predict cumulative incidence. In simulations, the Nomination method reduced cumulative incidence by one-sixth compared to Random vaccination; full network methods reduced infection by two-thirds. The High Degree approach had intermediate effectiveness. Somewhat surprisingly, FCD truncating individuals' degrees at three was as effective as using complete networks.CONCLUSIONS: Using even partial network information to prioritize vaccines at either the village or individual level, i.e. determine the optimal order of communities or individuals within each village, substantially improved epidemic outcomes. Such approaches may be feasible and effective in outbreak settings, and full ascertainment of network structure may not be required.

Minimizing Social Cost of Vaccinating Network SIS Epidemics.

Win-Win Zero-Determinant Strategy to Vaccinate the SIS Network Epidemics

Vaccinating SIS Epidemics in Networks with Zero-Determinant Strategy

Game-Theoretic Vaccination Against Networked SIS Epidemics and Impacts of Human Decision-Making

Global Analysis of an Sis Model with an Infective Vector on Complex Networks

Evolutionary Game of Vaccination Considering Both Epidemic and Economic Factors by Infectious Network of Complex Nodes

Vaccination behavior by coupling the epidemic spreading with the human decision under the game theory

Modeling Epidemics Spreading on Social Contact Networks

Mitigating biological epidemic on heterogeneous social networks

Cost-efficient vaccination protocols for network epidemiology

A new network immunization strategy better than the EGP strategy

A Differential Game Approach to Decentralized Virus-Resistant Weight Adaptation Policy over Complex Networks

Controlling epidemics through optimal allocation of test kits and vaccine doses across networks

Non massive immunization to contain spreading on complex networks

Effective vaccination strategies in network-based SIR model

Efficient vaccination strategies for epidemic control using network information

Decentralised adaptive-gain control for eliminating epidemic spreading on networks

The optimal edge for containing the spreading of SIS model

Analysis of epidemic vaccination strategies by node importance and evolutionary game on complex networks

Leveraging Opinions and Vaccination to Eradicate Networked Epidemics

The impact of information dissemination on vaccination in multiplex networks