Predictive Value of Spinal Cord Function Classification and Sagittal Deformity Angular Ratio for Neurologic Risk Stratification in Patients with Severe and Stiff Kyphoscoliosis

Xue-Shi Li,Heng-Wei Fan,Zi-Fang Huang,Yao-Long Deng,Bai-Ling Chen,Zhi-Zhong Li,Jun-Lin Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.041
IF: 2.21
2018-01-01
World Neurosurgery
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Three-column osteotomies were developed to treat severe spinal deformities but result in high neurologic complications and require further risk stratification. The present study investigated whether the combination of spinal cord function classification (SCFC) and deformity angular ratio (DAR) could further stratify the neurologic risks in the surgical correction of severe and stiff kyphoscoliosis. METHODS: The patients with kyphoscoliosis who had undergone posterior 3-column osteotomies at the spinal cord level were reviewed. Using our SCFC system, the preoperative neurologic function (type A, B, or C) was classified. The sagittal DAR (S-DAR), coronal, and total DARs were calculated. Intraoperative monitoring events and new neurologic deficits (NNDs) postoperatively were documented and analyzed using the SCFC and DAR or both combined. RESULTS: The NND rates increased significantly from type A to C (P = 0.000) and increased exponentially with an increase in S-DAR in types B and C but not type A. They also increased exponentially with aggravation of the SCFC in the medium and high but not low S-DAR group. All NNDs had recovered at 3 months for type A and most had recovered at 6 months for type B or C. CONCLUSIONS: The NNDs in type A SCFC usually experienced better recovery even with high S-DARs. Type B SCFC with an S-DAR >20 degrees and type C SCFC with any S-DAR resulted in significantly greater intra- and postoperative neurologic risks. The combination of SCFC and S-DAR can further stratify the intra- and postoperative neurologic risks with these procedures.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?