Evaluation of the effects of intra-arterial chemotherapy combined with intravesical chemotherapy against intravesical chemotherapy alone after transurethral resection of bladder tumor in T1-staged Grade 3 bladder cancer

Bin Huang,Hua Wang,Hao Lin,Zhijun Yao,Jiabo Zheng,Wenzhe Fan,Shaopeng Qiu,Lingwu Chen,Junxing Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-018-2811-5
2018-01-01
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
Abstract:Objective Comparing intra-arterial chemotherapy combined with intravesical chemotherapy against intravesical chemotherapy alone in the treatment of T1-staged Grade 3 (T1G3) bladder cancer after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). Materials and methods From January 2007 to December 2012, 203 patients diagnosed with NMIBC were randomly assigned into either intra-arterial chemotherapy combined with intravesical chemotherapy group (Group A, n = 68) or intravesical chemotherapy alone group (Group B, n = 135) after TURBT. Four cycles of intra-arterial chemotherapy were administered after initial TURBT with 1-month interval between each. Intravesical chemotherapy was administered in both groups including an immediate 50 mg epirubicin instillation after TURBT and weekly maintenance for 8 weeks, and then followed by monthly maintenance for 1 year. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival. Results Out of 203 patients, 53 were in Group A and 98 in Group B, and they were evaluated for recurrence and progression rate where recurrence rate was 35.8% (19/53) in group A and 41.8% (41/98) in group B with a significant difference ( P < 0.05) and progression rate was 20.7% (11/53) in group A and 23.5% (23/98) in group B with a significant difference ( P < 0.05). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that intra-arterial chemotherapy could be an independent risk factors related to both overall survival and time to first recurrence. Conclusions Intra-arterial chemotherapy combined with intravesical chemotherapy could reduce the risk of recurrence and progression compared to intravesical chemotherapy alone in T1G3 bladder cancer.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?