The Clinical and Biomarker Association of Programmed Death Ligand 1 and Its Spatial Heterogeneous Expression in Colorectal Cancer

Xiao-Li Wei,Qi-Nian Wu,Dong-Liang Chen,Zhao-Lei Zeng,Ze-Xian Liu,Jia-Bin Lu,Huai-Qiang Ju,Chao Ren,Zhi-Zhong Pan,Feng-Hua Wang,Rui-Hua Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.27735
IF: 3.9
2018-01-01
Journal of Cancer
Abstract:Background: Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression has been shown to predict benefit from anti-PD-1 treatment in several cancers. However, its predictive value in colorectal cancer seems limited. This study was aimed to explore the clinical and biomarker association of programmed death ligand 1 and its spatial heterogeneous expression in colorectal cancer. Methods: Tissue microarrays of 422 primary colorectal cancers from our hospital were used for the interpretation of PD-L1 and programmed death 1 (PD-1) expression, cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) and CD8 density and microsatellite instability (MSI) status by immunohistochemistry. To assess the spatial heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression, Tissue microarrays of 383 paired intra-primary-tumor tissues, and 105 paired lymph node metastatic tumors and 64 paired distant metastatic tumors were also used. Results: PD-L1 was positive in 188 (44.5%) primary colorectal cancers. PD-L1 expression was associated with less advanced N category (P< 0.001), less advanced TNM stage (P< 0.001) and less nervous invasion (P= 0.04). Higher PD-L1 expression was associated with higher PD-1 expression (P< 0.001), higher CD4 (P< 0.001) and CD8 (P<0.001) density and DNA mismatch repair deficiency (P= 0.01). PD-L1 expression was associated with better disease-free survival and overall survival, but it was only an independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival (hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval: 0.42 [0.25-0.72], P< 0.001). The probability of inconsistent PD-L1 expression was respectively 17.8%, 31.4% and 39.1% within primary tumors, between primary tumors and lymph node metastatic tumors, and between primary tumors and distant metastatic tumors. All the three differences were statistically significant (P< 0.001, P< 0.001 and P= 0.05, respectively). Conclusions: PD-L1 expression was a marker of pre-existing immune responses in colorectal cancer, however, it was heterogeneously expressed in colorectal cancer, especially between primary and metastatic tumors. This might partially explain the low-efficiency of its predictive value for benefit from anti-PD-1 treatment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?