Cue Reactivity Modulates Proactive and Reactive Motor Response Inhibition in Frequent Gamblers
Brevers Damien,He Qinghua,Keller Brenton,Noel Xavier,Bechara Antoine
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/conf.fnagi.2016.03.00013
IF: 4.8
2016-01-01
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Abstract:Event Abstract Back to Event Cue reactivity modulates proactive and reactive motor response inhibition in frequent gamblers Damien Brevers1*, Qinghua He2*, Brenton Keller1, Xavier Noel3 and Antoine Bechara1 1 University of Southern California, Psychology, United States 2 Southwest University, China 3 Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine whether motivationally salient cues could impact differently on proactive (the restrain of actions in preparation for stopping) and reactive (outright stopping) inhibition. Seventeen high-frequent poker gamblers and 16 matched non-gambler controls performed a modified version of the stop-signal paradigm that required participants to inhibit categorizing poker or neutral pictures. The probability that a stop-signal occurs was manipulated across blocks of trials, as indicated by the color of the back screen. First, we observed that, when viewing poker cues versus neutral cues, gamblers showed higher brain cue-related reactivity than controls, including the frontal orbital cortex, insula, and amygdala. Second, gamblers showed reduced proactive inhibition, as compared to controls. Moreover, in gamblers, proactive inhibition towards neutral cues was associated with lower brain activation in the middle and superior frontal gyrus. Third, gamblers did not differ from controls on behavioral indices of reactive inhibition. Nevertheless, during reactive inhibition of poker pictures, gamblers exhibited higher brain activation in the medial, middle, and superior frontal gyrus. Taken together, these results suggest that gamblers rely more on reactive than proactive control in order to inhibit motor response involving salient-gambling cues. Implications of present findings are discussed. Short abstract: This study highlighted that, at both neural and behavioral levels, high-frequent gamblers rely more on reactive (the restrain of actions in preparation for stopping) than proactive (a “late correction” process that results in the stopping of the ongoing action) control in order to inhibit their motor response toward salient-gambling cues. These findings confirm that investigating both reactive and proactive inhibition offer a fine-grained analysis of inhibitory control, and that fMRI is a good input for studying the dynamic underlining these two processes. This approach could also advance our knowledge on humans’ ability to control hedonic habits. Résumé en Français: Cette étude souligne, à la fois sur le plan neuronal et comportemental, que les joueurs avérés utilise plus un contrôle « réactif » (restreindre les actions pour se préparer à s’arrêter) qu’un contrôle « pro-actif » (corriger « tardivement » pour inhiber une action en cours) pour inhiber leurs réponses motrices envers un indice de jeu pertinent. Ceci confirme que l’étude de l’inhibition réactive et proactive permet une analyse fine du contrôle inhibiteur de nos actions et que la résonance magnétique fonctionnelle est un bon outil pour étudier la dynamique des processus cérébraux qui les sous-tendent. L’approche utilisée peut faire avancer nos connaissances sur la capacité humaine de contrôler les habitudes hédonistes. Samenvatting:in het Nederlands Deze studie toont aan dat frequente gokkers, zowel op neuronaal als op gedragsmatig niveau, eerder reactieve controle (het onderdrukken van een bepaalde actie ter voorbereiding tot het stoppen ervan) dan proactieve controle (een ‘laattijdig correctief’ proces dat resulteert in het onderbreken van een effectieve actie) om motorische processen te onderbreken naar gok-gerelateerde stimuli. Deze bevindingen bevestigen dat onderzoek van zowel reactieve als proactieve inhibitie van belang zijn in het onderzoek naar inhibitie processen. Tevens toont deze studie aan dat fMRI een valide techniek is om deze twee processen te bestuderen. Deze aanpak geeft ons meer inzicht hoe mensen hun hedonistische gewoontes trachten te controleren. Acknowledgements Funding for this study was provided by the National Center for Responsible Gaming (NCRG; Early Stage Investigator Grant). NCRG had no role in the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, writing the manuscript, or the decision to submit the paper for publication. Keywords: Proactive Inhibition, Reactive Inhibition, fMRI, Gambling, cue-reactivity, stop-signal task Conference: 6th Belgian Brain Congress, MONS, Belgium, 8 Oct - 8 Oct, 2016. Presentation Type: Poster Presentation Topic: Brain and brain diseases: between heredity and environment Citation: Brevers D, He Q, Keller B, Noel X and Bechara A (2016). Cue reactivity modulates proactive and reactive motor response inhibition in frequent gamblers. Conference Abstract: 6th Belgian Brain Congress. doi: 10.3389/conf.fnagi.2016.03.00013 Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters. The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated. Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed. For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions. Received: 27 Jun 2016; Published Online: 27 Jun 2016. * Correspondence: Dr. Damien Brevers, University of Southern California, Psychology, Los Angeles, United States, dbrevers@ulb.ac.be Dr. Qinghua He, Southwest University, Chongqing, China, heqinghua@gmail.com Login Required This action requires you to be registered with Frontiers and logged in. To register or login click here. Abstract Info Abstract The Authors in Frontiers Damien Brevers Qinghua He Brenton Keller Xavier Noel Antoine Bechara Google Damien Brevers Qinghua He Brenton Keller Xavier Noel Antoine Bechara Google Scholar Damien Brevers Qinghua He Brenton Keller Xavier Noel Antoine Bechara PubMed Damien Brevers Qinghua He Brenton Keller Xavier Noel Antoine Bechara Related Article in Frontiers Google Scholar PubMed Abstract Close Back to top Javascript is disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser settings in order to see all the content on this page.