The Effects of Fasting on the Metabolic Interaction Between Digestion and Locomotion in Juvenile Southern Catfish (silurus Meridionalis)
Shi-Jian Fu,Xu Pang,Zhen-Dong Cao,Jiang-Lan Peng,Guanjie Yan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.12.013
IF: 2.888
2010-01-01
Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A Molecular & Integrative Physiology
Abstract:To investigate the effect of fasting on maintenance metabolism, feeding metabolism and aerobic swimming performance as well as their metabolic interactions in juvenile southern catfish, we measured the following: (1) the postprandial oxygen consumption ((MO₂) response (16% body mass meal size) after 0 (control), 1, 2 and 4 weeks of fasting and (2) the swimming performance of non-digesting and digesting fish after either 0, 1, 2 or 4 weeks of fasting. The fasting groups displayed with lower resting MO₂ (MO₂(rest)), lower peak postprandial MO₂ (MO₂(peak)), larger energy expenditures and longer digestive processes than those of the control groups. The critical swimming speed (U(crit)), the active MO₂ (MO₂(active)) and the metabolic scope (MO₂(active) - MO₂(rest), MS) of both non-digesting and digesting fish all decreased progressively after 1, 2 and 4 weeks of fasting, with those of non-digesting fish decreased more acutely than digesting fish (P<0.05). Digesting fish displayed with a 14%, 23%, 27% and 71% significantly higher MO₂(active) than that of non-digesting fish in the 0-, 1-, 2- and 4-week fasting groups. Digestion only caused a significantly lower U(crit) and MS in both the 0- and 1-week fasting groups (P<0.05). The MO₂ increased greatly with the swimming speed, and digestion caused a higher MO₂ when compared to that of the fasting fish in any groups. The MO₂ of fish in the 4-week fasting group was significantly lower than that of other groups when the swimming speed was the same. In conclusion, both digestive and locomotive functions were down-regulated during fasting. In the 0- and 1-week fasting groups, the decreased MS for swimming during digestion caused a lower U(crit) (i.e., a digestion priority model). However, because the MO₂(active) of digesting fish decreased much more slowly than that of fasting fish, the MS of the 2- and 4-week fasting groups did not change during digestion, and the fish could handle both physiological activities independently (i.e., an additive model).