The effects of a transitional care program on discharge readiness, transitional care quality, health services utilization and satisfaction among Chinese kidney transplant recipients: A randomized controlled trial
Rujun Hu,Bo Gu,Qiling Tan,KaiZhi Xiao,Xiaoqin Li,Xiaoyi Cao,Turun Song,Xiaolian Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103700
Abstract:Background: Kidney transplantation is the major treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) face severe challenges during the transition period from hospital discharge to home, increasing the risk of early hospital readmission (EHR) and affecting patient safety. Nevertheless, knowledge of effective transitional care for KTRs is limited in China. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of an innovative transitional care program in improving discharge readiness, transitional care quality, health services utilization and patient satisfaction among KTRs in China. Design: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Settings and participants: Patients admitted to undergo kidney transplantation were recruited in a general tertiary hospital in Chengdu, China. Methods: A total of 220 eligible patients were recruited and randomly assigned to the intervention and control groups. Participants in the intervention group received a transitional care intervention developed by the research team, including a risk assessment for early readmission, health education from admission to predischarge, individualized discharge planning, and a telephone follow-up once per week for one month and WeChat follow-up postdischarge. The control group received routine care of comparable length and follow-up contact. A trained research assistant collected all patients' baseline data on admission (T0), evaluated the discharge readiness (by the Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale) on the day of discharge (T1), collected data on transitional care quality (by the Care Transition Measure-15) and patients' satisfaction with transitional care services (by a self-developed patient satisfaction scale) on the 30th day postdischarge (T2), and collected data on hospital readmission, unscheduled outpatient department visits, and emergency room visits on the 30th and 90th days (by a self-developed health services utilization record table) (T3) postdischarge. Intervention effects were analyzed using independent samples t-tests, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U tests, Chi-square tests or Fisher's exact test. Results: Compared with the control group, the intervention group showed significantly better discharge readiness (personal status, P<0.001; knowledge, P = 0.010; coping ability, P<0.001; expected support, P = 0.007; total score, P<0.001), better transitional care quality (importance of preferences, P<0.001; management preparation, P<0.001; critical understanding, P = 0.003; written and understandable care plan, P = 0.012; total score, P<0.001), lower readmission rate at T2 (P = 0.033) and at T3 (P = 0.013), lower emergency room visit rate at T3 (P = 0.014), and better satisfaction with transitional care services (P<0.001). Conclusions: This study provides evidence that an innovative transitional care program is effective in promoting KTRs' discharge readiness, transitional care quality, reducing hospital readmission and emergency room visits, and improving their satisfaction with transitional care services. Trial registration: Clinical Trials ChiCTR1800014971.