Abstract:Cells impose optimal noise control mechanism in diverse situations to cope with distinct environmental cues. Sometimes, it is desirable for the cell to utilize fluctuations for noise-driven processes. In other cases, noise can be harmful to the cell to show optimal fitness. It is, therefore, important to unravel the noise propagation mechanism inside the cell. Such noise controlling mechanism is accomplished by using gene transcription regulatory networks. One such gene regulatory network is feed-forward loop, having three regulatory nodes S, X and Y. Here, we consider the most abundant type 1 of coherent and incoherent feed-forward loops with both OR and AND logic functions, forming four different architectures. In OR logic function, the functions representing S and X act additively for the regulation of Y, while in AND logic function, the same functions (S and X) act multiplicatively for the regulation of Y. Measurement of susceptibility of the signal at output Y is done using elasticity of each regulation in FFLs. Using susceptibility, we demonstrate the nature of pathway integration by which one-step and two-step pathways get overlapped. The integration type is competitive for motifs having OR gate, while it is noncompetitive for the same with AND gate. The pathway integration property explains the output noise behavior of the motifs properly but cannot infer about the mechanism by which the upstream noise propagates to output. To account this, the total output noise is decomposed, which results in integrated noise as an additional noise source along with pathway-specific noise components. The integrated noise is found to appear as a consequence of integration between the pathways and has different functional characteristics explaining noise amplification and noise attenuation property of coherent and incoherent feed-forward loops, respectively. The noise decomposition also quantifies the contribution of different noise sources toward total noise. Finally, the noise propagation is being tuned as a function of input signal noise and its time scale of fluctuations, which shows considerable intrinsic noise strength and relatively slow relaxation time scale causes a higher degree of noise propagation in FFLs.

Noise Decomposition Principle in A Coherent Feed-Forward and Transcriptional Regulatory Loop

Noise decomposition algorithm and propagation mechanism in feed-forward gene transcriptional regulatory loop

Noise-induced Dynamics in the Mixed-Feedback-loop Network Motif.

Noise Propagation in Gene Regulation Networks Involving Interlinked Positive and Negative Feedback Loops

Dynamics of two feed forward genetic motifs in the presence of molecular noise

Role of integrated noise in pathway-specific signal propagation in feed-forward loops

Decomposition and Tunability of Expression Noise in the Presence of Coupled Feedbacks

Buffering gene expression noise by microRNA based feedforward regulation

Stochastic and Coherence Resonance in Feed-Forward-Loop Neuronal Network Motifs

MicroRNA Based Feedforward Control of Intrinsic Gene Expression Noise

Noise Processing by MicroRNA-Mediated Circuits: the Incoherent Feed-Forward Loop, Revisited

The dynamic mechanism of noisy signal decoding in gene regulation

The Role of Incoherent MicroRNA-Mediated Feedforward Loops in Noise Buffering

Noise-induced synchronization and regularity in feed-forward-loop motifs

Intrinsic noise in post-transcriptional gene regulation by small non-coding RNA.

Suppression and enhancement of transcriptional noise by DNA looping

Stochastic Analysis Of An Incoherent Feedforward Genetic Motif

Effects of Additive and Multiplicative Noises on Gene Transcription Regulation

Cis-Regulatory Logic Produces Gene-Expression Noise Describing Phenotypic Heterogeneity in Bacteria

Noise Effects on Oscillator Network of Transcription Regulators

Biological Sources of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Noise in cI Expression of Lysogenic Phage Lambda