Comparable Efficacy and Safety of Chinese Generic Imatinib and Branded Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Retrospective Study

Xuelin Dou,Yazhen Qin,Yueyun Lai,Hongxia Shi,Xiaojun Huang,Qian Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2019-130081
IF: 20.3
2019-01-01
Blood
Abstract:Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety between Chinese generic imatinib (Xinwei®, Jiansu Hansoh Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.) versus branded imatinib (Glivec®, Novartis) in patients with newly-diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP were enrolled and assigned to receive either Xinwei or Glivec at an initial dose of 400 mg/d according to patients' financial capability. The efficacy and adverse effects were evaluated. Results: From January 2014 to September 2015, 145 eligible patients were assigned to Xinwei (n=89) or Glivec (n=56) group. All patients were treated and followed up at least 3 months. At 3 months, the complete response rates were 95.5%(85/89) and 100%(56/56), major cytogenetic response rates were 74.2%(66/89) and 80.4%(45/56), and the proportions of achieving BCR-ALBIS≤10% were 76.1%(67/88) and 82.1%(46/56) in Xinwei and Glivec groups respectively (all P>0.05). With a median follow-up of 12 months, 2 patients in each group progressed to accelerate or blast phase. Hematologic and non-hematologic side effects were similar between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Early hematological, cytogenetic and molecular responses between Xinwei and Glivec are comparable in newly-diagnosed CML-CP patients. The progression rate and side effects are also similar between the 2 groups.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?