Thin-Section Computed Tomography-Histopathologic Comparisons of Pulmonary Focal Interstitial Fibrosis, Atypical Adenomatous Hyperplasia, Adenocarcinoma in Situ, and Minimally Invasive Adenocarcinoma with Pure Ground-Glass Opacity

Ming-Jue Si,Xiao-Feng Tao,Guang-Ye Du,Ling-Ling Cai,Hong-Xiu Han,Xi-Zi Liang,Jiang-Min Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.07.012
IF: 4.531
2016-01-01
European Journal of Radiology
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To retrospectively compare focal interstitial fibrosis (FIF), atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) with pure ground-glass opacity (GGO) using thin-section computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS:Sixty pathologically confirmed cases were reviewed including 7 cases of FIF, 17 of AAH, 23of AIS, and 13 of MIA. All nodules kept pure ground glass appearances before surgical resection and their last time of thin-section CT imaging data before operation were collected. Differences of patient demographics and CT features were compared among these four types of lesions. RESULTS:FIF occurred more frequently in males and smokers while the others occurred more frequently in female nonsmokers. Nodule size was significant larger in MIA (P<0.001, cut-off value=7.5mm). Nodule shape (P=0.045), margin characteristics (P<0.001), the presence of pleural indentation (P=0.032), and vascular ingress (P<0.001) were significant factors that differentiated the 4 groups. A concave margin was only demonstrated in a high proportion of FIF at 85.7% (P=0.002). There were no significant differences (all P>0.05) in age, malignant history, attenuation value, location, and presence of bubble-like lucency. CONCLUSION:A nodule size >7.5mm increases the possibility of MIA. A concave margin could be useful for differentiation of FIF from the other malignant or pre-malignant GGO nodules. The presence of spiculation or pleural indentation may preclude the diagnosis of AAH.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?