A Disputed Evidence on Obesity: Comparison of the Effects of Rcan2−/− and Rps6kb1−/− Mutations on Growth and Body Weight in C57BL/6J Mice

Jing Zhao,Shi-wei Li,Qian-qian Gong,Ling-cui Ding,Ye-cheng Jin,Jian Zhang,Jian-gang Gao,Xiao-yang Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.b1600276
2016-01-01
Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B
Abstract:It is widely accepted that body weight and adipose mass are tightly regulated by homeostatic mechanisms, in which leptin plays a critical role through hypothalamic pathways, and obesity is a result of homeostatic disorder. However, in C57BL/6J mice, we found that Rcan2 increases food intake and plays an important role in the development of age- and diet-induced obesity through a leptin-independent mechanism. RCAN2 was initially identified as a thyroid hormone (T3)-responsive gene in human fibroblasts. Expression of RCAN2 is regulated by T3 through the PI3K-Akt/PKB-mTOR-Rps6kb1 signaling pathway. Intriguingly, both Rcan2 (-/-) and Rps6kb1 (-/-) mutations were reported to result in lean phenotypes in mice. In this study we compared the effects of these two mutations on growth and body weight in C57BL/6J mice. We observed reduced body weight and lower fat mass in both Rcan2 (-/-) and Rps6kb1 (-/-) mice compared to the wild-type mice, and we reported other differences unique to either the Rcan2 (-/-) or Rps6kb1 (-/-) mice. Firstly, loss of Rcan2 does not directly alter body length; however, Rcan2 (-/-) mice exhibit reduced food intake. In contrast, Rps6kb1 (-/-) mice exhibit abnormal embryonic development, which leads to smaller body size and reduced food intake in adulthood. Secondly, when fed a normal chow diet, Rcan2 (-/-) mice weigh significantly more than Rps6kb1 (-/-) mice, but both Rcan2 (-/-) and Rps6kb1 (-/-) mice develop similar amounts of epididymal fat. On a high-fat diet, Rcan2 (-/-) mice gain body weight and fat mass at slower rates than Rps6kb1 (-/-) mice. Finally, using the double-knockout mice (Rcan2 (-/-) Rps6kb1 (-/-)), we demonstrate that concurrent loss of Rcan2 and Rps6kb1 has an additive effect on body weight reduction in C57BL/6J mice. Our data suggest that Rcan2 and Rps6kb1 mutations both affect growth and body weight of mice, though likely through different mechanisms.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?