Nasolacrimal Recanalization As an Alternative to External Dacryocystorhinostomy for Treating Failed Nasolacrimal Duct Intubation.

Jiaxu Hong,Tingting Qian,Anji Wei,Zhongmou Sun,Dan Wu,Yihe Chen,Anna Marmalidou,Yi Lu,Xinghuai Sun,Zuguo Liu,Francisco Amparo,Jianjiang Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000004350
IF: 1.6
2016-01-01
Medicine
Abstract:To compare the surgical duration and clinical outcomes of nasolacrimal recanalization versus external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) in the treatment of failed nasolacrimal duct intubation.This is a retrospective, comparative, and interventional study. We evaluated the outcomes of 66 consecutive patients undergoing either nasolacrimal recanalization (n=32) or DCR (n=34) in a tertiary lacrimal disease referral center. Length of surgical duration, clinical outcomes, and rate of recurrence at 18 months postoperatively were compared.The mean surgical duration was 18.5 minutes (range, 15-25 minutes) for nasolacrimal recanalization and 48.2 minutes (range, 45-61 minutes) for DCR, respectively (P<0.001). The rate of success was 84.4% in the recanalization group and 85.3% in the DCR group, respectively (P=0.91). The time to recurrence was 2.6 +/- 1.1 months in the recanalization group and 5.6 +/- 2.1 months in the DCR group (P<0.001). Five failed cases in each group received a secondary DCR surgery with the same resolution rate (40%). The absence of ocular discharge at baseline was a significant predictor for a successful outcome in the recanalization group (P=0.04) but not in the DCR group (P=0.63).Nasolacrimal recanalization is an effective, safe, and time-saving alternative to DCR for the treatment of failed nasolacrimal duct intubation. Clinicians should be cautious in patients with discharge.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?