The Characteristics Of Peripapillary Retinal Perfusion By Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography In Tessellated Fundus Eyes

Xiaolei Wang,Yingying Zheng,Xiangmei Kong,Li Zhu,Xinghuai Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159911
IF: 3.7
2016-01-01
PLoS ONE
Abstract:PurposeTo evaluate the peripapillary and perifoveal retinal perfusions of young healthy eyes with a tessellated fundus using optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography.MethodsThirty-five Chinese subjects with a tessellated fundus and 35 subjects without a tessellated fundus from a population-based cross-sectional study in Shanghai were included. All participants underwent OCT angiography. The flow index and vessel density were examined in the peripapillary and perifoveal retinal areas, and their relationships with other ocular parameters were analyzed.ResultsIn the peripapillary area, the eyes with a tessellated fundus had a lower retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) flow index (0.055 +/- 0.009 vs. 0.061 +/- 0.007, P = 0.006), RNFL vessel density (61.8 +/- 7.3 vs. 65.9 +/- 5.2, P = 0.010), retinal flow index (0.086 +/- 0.010 vs. 0.092 +/- 0.008, P = 0.012), and retinal vessel density (83.7 +/- 5.0 vs. 86.4 +/- 3.7, P = 0.018) than the control eyes, and the difference remained significant even after adjustments were made for gender and RNFL thickness. No difference was found in the perifoveal area. Multivariable linear regression analysis showed that the retinal flow index and vessel density in the peripapillary area were significantly correlated with the tessellated fundus diagnosis (flow index: beta = -0.006, P = 0.005; vessel density: beta = -2.597, P = 0.006), gender (flow index: beta = 0.005, P = 0.019; vessel density: beta = 3.129, P = 0.002) and RNFL thickness (flow index: beta = 0.000, P = 0.002; vessel density: beta = 0.190, P = 0.002). The RNFL flow index and vessel density were significantly associated with the tessellated fundus diagnosis (flow index: beta = -0.005, P = 0.005; vessel density: beta = -3.572, P = 0.008) and the thickness of RNFL (flow index: beta = 0.001, P < 0.001; vessel density: beta = 0.421, P < 0.001).ConclusionsEyes with tessellated fundus with a relative decreased peripapillary retinal perfusion compared with eyes without a tessellated fundus were observed. The findings whether indicate causality that the reduction in the peripapillary perfusion and the peripapillary atrophy in myopia, need further study.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?