Choledochoscopic manometry research of the sphincter of Oddi motility in bile duct stone patients with a T tube after operation
Zhong Tian,Shuo-Dong Wu,Jing Kong,Zhen-Hai Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11569/wcjd.v14.i11.1119
2006-01-01
World Chinese Journal of Digestology
Abstract:AIM: To study the sphincter of Oddi (SO) motility by choledochoscopic manometry, and to investigate the manometric appearance of sphincter of Oddi disorders and its relationship with bile duct stones. METHODS: Two hundred and sixteet patients who had a T tube after operation were assessed by choledochoscopic manometry. SO basal pressure (SOBP), amplitude of SO contractions (SOCA), frequency of SO contractions (SOCF), duration of SO contractions (SOCD), duodenal pressure (DP), common bile duct pressure (CBDP), and the percentage of propagate directions were scored and analyzed. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to the levels of sphincter of Oddi basal pressure: group A (sphincter of Oddi hypomotility), group B (normal SOPB), group C (SOBP a little higher than normal) and group D (sphincter of Oddi dysfunction). RESULTS: The mean SOCA in group A was 62.32±32.13 mmHg, much lower than that in the other three groups (P < 0.01); the mean SOCD in group A was shorter than that in group B and group C (P < 0.01); the mean SOCF in group A had no significant difference from that in group B and group C, but lower than that in group D (P < 0.05); the mean CBDP in group A was 3.89±8.10 mmHg, much lower than that in group D (P < 0.01), but higher than SOBP. The SOCA in group D was 97.02±51.76 mmHg, apparently higher than that in group A (P < 0.01), which was not significantly different from that in group B and group C, but with a tendency to increase; the mean SOCD in group D was shorter than that in group C (P < 0.05), and there was no apparent difference between the other two groups; the mean SOCF in group D was markedly higher than that in the other three groups (P < 0.01 or P < 0.05); the mean CBDP in group D was 10.41±12.37 mmHg, higher than that in group A and B (P < 0.01) , but was not statistically different from that in group C; the percentage of retrograde peristalsis in group D (35.73% ± 26.38%) was notably higher than that in group A (20.31%± 21.96%) and B (22.71%± 23.86%)(P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: SO dysfunction and hypomotility exist in bile duct stone patients after operation, which can be diagnosed effectively by choledochoscopic manometry. The SO disorders may be associated with the formation or/and recurrence of bile duct stones.