Molecular phylogenetic relationships of 30 grouper species in China Seas based on 16S rDNA fragment sequences
DING Shao-Xiong,WANG Ying-Hui,WANG Jun,ZHUANG Xuan,SU Yong-Quan,YOU Ying-Zhe,LI Qi-Fu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-5507.2006.03.011
2006-01-01
Abstract:The Subfamily Epinephelinae (Teleoste: Serranidae), commonly known as groupers, comprises about 159 species of marine fishes in 15 genera. They are bottom-associated fishes found in tropical and subtropical waters. Most species occur on coral reefs, but some live in estuaries or on rocky reefs. Groupers are of considerable economic value, however, the classification and evolutionary relationships of them have always been hindered by the overwhelming number of species, global distribution, and the lack of morphological specializations traditionally used in ichthyological classification. The confusion and debates have brought much trouble not only to the study of the phylogenetic relationships among groupers, but also to the identification of fry and parent in grouper aquaculture. In this study, to evaluate the phylogenetic relationship of the groupers from the China Seas, the 16S ribosomal DNA of thirty grouper species within six genera of subfamily Epinephelinae were amplified using PCR techniques, 572 bp DNA fragments were obtained and the sequences were analyzed. The genetic information indexes, including Kimura-2 parameter genetic distance and Ts/Tv ratios, were generated using a suite of biology software. Of the 572 aligned base pairs, among which insertion or deletion of base pairs was evident, 373 were constant, 151 were parsimony informative, comprising 26.4% of the total base pairs. The maximum pairwise nucleotide divergence value among all taxa was 0.186 between Epinephelus malabaricus and Plectropomus laevis and the minimum value was 0.007 between E.moara and E.bruneus. The average pairwise nucleotide divergence value among all taxa was 0.079. Transitions were found to be more common than transversions. The average transition/transversion ratio among all pairwise comparisons was 1.7, suggesting that the sequences had not reached saturation. The sequence analysis also showed an obvious adenine bias on the 16S ribosomal DNA fragment and no anti-guanine bias was detected. With Pronotogrammus multifasciatus (No.AF297330) and Johnius belengerii (No.AY336727) as the designated outgroups and additional homologous sequences information of other Cephalopolis and Epinephelus fishes invoked from GenBank, phylogenetic trees were constructed based on the neighbor-joining (NJ),maximum-parsimony (MP) and maximum-likelihood (ML) methods. Conclusions were drawn as follow: 1) all the phylogenic trees suggested that genus Plectropomus, which obviously showed monophyly, is the most primitive group among the subfamily Epinephelinae in this study; genus Cephalopolis is also recovered as a monophyletic group and is more primitive than genus Epinephelus; the evolutionary status of genus Variola is between genus Cephalopolis and genus Plectropomus; 2) Promicrops lanceolatus should be included in genus Epinephelus because it emerged as a cluster within the clade of Epinephelus and had a close relationship with E.coioides and E.malabaricus; Cromileptes altivelis also showed close relationship with genus Epinephelus; perhaps a specialization group within genus Epinephelus; 3) genus Epinephelus was located at the top of the phylogenetic tree indicating that it is the most recently diverged species, which is in accordance with the fact that it is also the most flourishing genus in Epinephelinae. There are two parallel evolutionary sister clades existing (with high bootstrap value support) in genus Epinephelus. However the species-level differences within these clads are not clear due to the lack of high bootstrap values support. The species within this two clades seem to be irrelevant to their biogeographic distributions, which suggested that there were two parallel evolutionary ancestors existing in the early evolution stage of genus Epinephelus and their on-going divergence should be earlier than the existence of geographic floras of genus Epinephelus.