Early CT compared with bone scintigraphy in suspected schapoid fractures.
A. D. de Zwart,S. Rhemrev,L. Kingma,S. Meylaerts,J. Arndt,I. Schipper,F. Beeres
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0B013E31826382CD
IF: 10.6
2012-10-01
Clinical Nuclear Medicine
Abstract:Dear Editor, I n December 2010, Clinical Nuclear Medi cine published our study, examining whether multidetector CT is superior to bone scintigraphy for diagnosing radiographically occult scaphoid fractures. Based on the results in this consecutive series of 100 patients, we could not confirm that early CT is superior to bone scintigraphy for suspected scaphoid fractures. We initially stopped after inclusion of 100 patients. However, throughout the following period, we were fortunate enough to continue inclusions to 159 patients. With this extended group of patients, we were able to provide more significant results. Wewould like to present the final results of our study to the readers of Clinical Nuclear Medicine. The design of the study is described in our previous publication. In a period of 39 months, a total number of 159 consecutive patients with a suspected scaphoid fracture visited the emergency department, 79 of whomwere male and 80were female, with a mean age of 41 years (range, 17Y88 y). CT scans showed 15 scaphoid and 35 other fractures. Bone scintigraphy showed 28 scaphoid and 57 other fractures. According to the reference standard, there were 20 scaphoid fractures. One CT scan was false-positive and CT missed 6 scaphoid fractures. Bone scintigraphy was false-positive in 9 cases and missed 1 scaphoid fracture. CT had a sensitivity of 70%, specificity of 99%, accuracy of 96%, a positive predictive value of 93%, and a negative predictive value of 96%. Bone scintigraphy had a sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 94%, accuracy of 94%, a positive predictive value of 68%, and a negative predictive value of 99%. The percentages of sensitivity, specificity, and correct predictions (accuracy) were compared for the 2 diagnostic methods with a McNemar test. Although the sensitivity of CT seemed to be lower (70%) than that of bone scintigraphy (95%), this could not be confirmed statistically (P = 0.13), probably because of the small number of scaphoid fractures (n = 20). Accuracy did not differ significantly either between CT and bone scintigraphy (P = 0.63). The specificity of CT was significantly better than that of bone scintigraphy (P = 0.02). On the basis of these results, CT seems the investigation of choice for ruling in, and bone scintigraphy for ruling out, a scaphoid fracture in clinically suspected patients. In conclusion, after increasing the power of our studywith additional data, our previous statement is confirmed that early CT imaging is not superior to bone scintigraphy for suspected scaphoid fractures. Andele de Zwart, MS Department of Surgery Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden, Netherlands andeledezwart@gmail.com Steven J. Rhemrev, MD Department of Surgery Medical Centre Haaglanden The Hague, Netherlands Lucas M. Kingma, MD, PhD Department of Radiology University Medical Centre Groningen Groningen, Netherlands Sven A.G. Meylaerts, MD, PhD Department of Surgery Medical Centre Haaglanden The Hague, Netherlands Jan-Willem Arndt, MD, PhD Department of Diagnostic Medical Centre Haaglanden The Hague, Netherlands Inger B. Schipper, MD, PhD Department of Surgery Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden, Netherlands Frank J.P. Beeres, MD, PhD Department of Surgery Medical Centre Haaglanden The Hague, Netherlands