Current Status of Breast Reconstruction in China: an Experience of 951 Breast Reconstructions from a Single Institute

Nai-Si Huang,Chen-Lian Quan,Lin-Xiao-Xi Ma,Jing Si,Jia-Jian Chen,Ben-Long Yang,Xiao-Yan Huang,Guang-Yu Liu,Zhen-Zhou Shen,Zhi-Min Shao,Jiong Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2016.03.01
2016-01-01
Gland Surgery
Abstract:BACKGROUND Since mastectomy remained the primary strategy for treating breast cancer in China, post-mastectomy reconstruction is of great importance in the Chinese population. The current study aimed to assess the current status of breast reconstruction in China. METHODS We reviewed all patients who received breast reconstruction from August 2000 to July 2015 in the Department of Breast Surgery in our institute. Patients' baseline characteristics, reconstruction strategy, final pathology and loco-regional recurrence (LRR) information were collected. RESULTS A total of 951 breast reconstructions were conducted during the past 15 years, among which 247 (27.0%) were abdominal flap reconstruction; 471 (51.5%) were latissimus dorsi myocutaneous ± implant; and 233 (25.5%) were prosthesis-based reconstruction. The majority of cases (78.1%) were invasive breast cancer and up to 894 cases (94.0%) were immediate reconstruction. Prosthesis-based reconstruction rapidly increased in recent years, and was associated with bilateral reconstruction, contralateral augmentation and higher complications. 18 patients (2.0%) developed local-regional recurrence at the median follow-up time of 26.6 months (range, 3.7-62.0 months). A total of 66 nipple-areolar complex-sparing mastectomies (NSMs) (6.9%) were performed, none of which developed recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Breast reconstruction cases increased over the 15 years with the change of paradigm. Most strikingly, prosthesis-based reconstruction rapidly gained its prevalence and became the most common strategy. NSM was only performed for highly selected patients. Patients with breast reconstruction were able to achieve satisfactory loco-regional control in our cohort.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?