Cost–Effectiveness of Clopidogrel-Aspirin Versus Aspirin Alone for Acute Tia and Minor Stroke

Y. Pan,Y. L. Wang,G. Liu,K. Zhao,Y. Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.256
IF: 5.156
2014-01-01
Value in Health
Abstract::Treatment with the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin taken soon after a transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke was shown to reduce the 90-day risk of stroke in a large trial in China, but the cost-effectiveness is unknown. This study sought to estimate the cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel-aspirin regimen for acute TIA or minor stroke. :A Markov model was created to determine the cost-effectiveness of treatment of acute TIA or minor stroke patients with clopidogrel-aspirin compared with aspirin alone. Inputs for the model were obtained from clinical trial data, claims databases, and the published literature. The main outcome measure was cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. One-way and multivariable probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the findings. :Compared to aspirin alone, clopidogrel-aspirin resulted in a lifetime gain of 0.037 QALYs at an additional cost of CNY 1250 (US$ 192), yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CNY 33,800 (US$ 5200) per QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that clopidogrel-aspirin therapy was more cost-effective in 95.7% of the simulations at a willingness-to-pay threshold recommended by the World Health Organization of CNY 105,000 (US$ 16,200) per QALY. :Early 90-day clopidogrel-aspirin regimen for acute TIA or minor stroke is highly cost-effective in China. If clopidogrel were generic, treatment with clopidogrel-aspirin would have been cost saving.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?