[Clinical Value of Transvaginal Ultrasound, MRI and Hysteroscopy in the Assessment of Endometrial Cancer Lesion Size].

Yuan Yang,Lijun Zhao,Zhiqi Wang,Jun Tang,Jing Geng,Nan Hong,Jianliu Wang,Lihui Wei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2016.01.009
2016-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To investigate the clinical significance of transvaginal ultrasound, hysteroscopy and MRI in the assessment of endometrial cancer lesions size.METHODS:Data from 56 patients who successively underwent transvaginal ultrasound, MRI and hysteroscopy inspection preoperative endometrial carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed to assess the accuracy of lesions size.RESULTS:The pathologic lesions size measured mean maximum diameter of 56 cases was (3.05±0.23) cm, while the mean maximum diameter measured by vaginal ultrasound, MRI and hysteroscopy were respectivelly (2.46±0.31) cm, (3.12±0.08) cm, and (3.18±0.21) cm. Compared with the pathologic measured values, the compliance rates of transvaginal ultrasound, hysteroscopy and MRI were respectively 54% (30/56), 71% (40/56) and 75% (42/56), which vaginal ultrasound measurement value was significantly different than that by pathologic measured (P=0.031), while there were significant difference between the hysteroscopy measured lesion size and pathologic measured, or between MRI measured values and pathologic measured (all P>0.05).CONCLUSION:Preoperative assess the endometrial cancer lesions size, significance of vaginal ultrasound examination is limited, and MRI and hysteroscopy examination is accurate, but easy to over-estimated lesion size.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?