Abstract:Objective: To compare the effectiveness of robot-assisted and traditional freehand screw placement in the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation. Methods: The clinical data of 55 patients with atlantoaxial dislocation who met the selection criteria between January 2021 and January 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different screw placement methods, they were divided into the traditional group (using the traditional freedhand screw placement, 31 cases) and the robot group (using the Mazor X robot-assisted screw placement, 24 cases). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, etiology, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, cervical spine Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, operation cost, and intraoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. The VAS score and cervical spine JOA score were used to evaluate the improvement of pain and cervical spinal cord function before operation and at 1 month after operation. CT examination was performed at 3 days after operation, and the accuracy of screw placement was evaluated according to Neo grading criteria. Results: All the 55 patients successfully completed the operation. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and operation cost in the robot group were significantly higher than those in the traditional group ( P<0.05). A total of 220 C 1 and C 2 pedicle screws were inserted in the two groups, and 94 were inserted in the robot group, with an accuracy rate of 95.7%, among them, 2 were inserted by traditional freehand screw placement due to bleeding caused by intraoperative slip. And 126 pedicle screws were inserted in the traditional group, with an accuracy rate of 87.3%, which was significantly lower than that in the robot group ( P<0.05). There were 1 case of venous plexus injury in the robot group and 3 cases in the traditional group, which improved after pressure hemostasis treatment. No other intraoperative complication such as vertebral artery injury or spinal cord injury occurred in both groups. All patients were followed up 4-16 months with an average of 6.6 months, and there was no significant difference in the follow-up time between the two groups ( P>0.05). Postoperative neck pain significantly relieved in both groups, and neurological symptoms relieved to varying degrees. The VAS score and cervicle spine JOA score of both groups significantly improved at 1 month after operation when compared with preoperative scores ( P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the score change between the two groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion: In the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation, the accuracy of robot-assisted screw placement is superior to the traditional freedhand screw placement.

[Analysis of Medical Cost of Atlantoaxial Disorders in Patients Receiving Innovated Treatment Technologies].

[Clinical Effect of Posterior Atlanto Axial Vertebra Internal Fixation for Treatment of Instability of Occipitocervical].

Radiofrequency Ablation Using the ThermoCool SmartTouch Catheter Guided by Ablation Index Versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Atrial Fibrillation Treatment in China: a Cost-Consequence Analysis.

True Cost of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement and Implications for Price Setting and Diagnosis-Related Groups: Evidence from a Tertiary Hospital in Eastern China

Improving C1 Pedicle Screw Placement for Atlantoaxial Instability with Ultrasonic Bone Burr Assistance

Clinical effect and prognosis of transoral or endoscope-assisted transoral release for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation: A retrospective cohort study

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Using A Single Dose of Tranexamic Acid in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis Patients Undergoing Long-Segment Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Retrospective Study

Efficacy Comparison of Minimally Invasive Atlantoaxial Mass Fusion and Open Atlantoaxial Fusion in the Treatment of Atlantoaxial Dislocation

[Effectiveness comparison of robot-assisted and traditional freehand technology in treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation]

Hospital Efficiency and Utilization of High-Technology Medical Equipment: A Panel Data Analysis

[Comparative study of computer-assisted and robot-assisted atlantoaxial pedicle screw implantation for reversible atlantoaxial dislocation]

Cost Analysis of Oral and Maxillofacial Free Flap Reconstruction for Patients at an Institution in China

The cost of total hip arthroplasty: compare the hospitalization costs of national centralized procurement and national volume-based procurement

Atlantoaxial reduction and fixation guided by the intraoperative CT

The effect of hospital characteristics on pediatric neuromuscular scoliosis fusion cost

Cost Analysis of Total Knee Replacement Surgery

An Investigation Into The Disease Profile And Healthcare Costs Of Inpatients Treated At A Major Oral And Maxillofacial Surgical Center

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in Chinese patients with intermediate and high surgical risk for aortic stenosis: a decision analysis on effect, affordability and cost-effectiveness

A cost-effectiveness analysis of intraoperative autologous transfusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: a single-centre retrospective study

Advances in surgical treatment for atlantoaxial instability focusing on rheumatoid arthritis: Analysis of a series of 67 patients

Surgical treatment of atlantoaxial metastases:a retrospective study