Abstract:Recipients often reject unfair offers at the cost of their own interests in ultimatum games (UGs), reflecting their fairness preference. Yet fairness preference is not invariable. It is affected by various factors, among which empathy plays an important role. Individuals might, for example, sacrifice own interests to help others in need. This kind of behavior not only is contrary to the pursuit of self-interest maximization but also violates fairness principles. As individuals are not only concerned about fairness but also care for others, this study focuses on managing the relationship between the two potentially conflicting goals. We explored individuals’ behaviors and time dynamic processes of brain activities when fairness conflicted with empathy. It was hypothesized that empathy could modulate fairness-related decision making behaviors and ERPs. Thirty-seven college students (26 females, 21.00 ± 2.07 years) participated in this study and completed multiple ultimatum games. EEG signals were recorded during play. In the task, the proposers were underprivileged students (empathy condition) and ordinary children (non-empathy condition). Each proposer distributed 10 yuan between themself and one recipient. The participants played as recipients who would choose to accept or reject distribution offers (fair, disadvantageous unfair, advantageous unfair) by the proposers. The proposers and recipients would get the assigned money only if participants accepted the distribution offers. They received nothing if participants rejected the offer. The behavioral results showed that the acceptance rate in the empathy condition was greater than that in the non-empathy condition for the disadvantageous unfair condition, while the opposite result occurred in the advantageous unfair condition. The EEG results showed that in the non-empathy condition, the advantageous unfair offer induced more negative anterior N1 (AN1) than it did in the empathy condition, but there was no difference between the disadvantageous unfair versus fair conditions. In the advantageous unfair condition, the P2 amplitude of the

Ingroup favoritism or the black sheep effect: Perceived intentions modulate subjective responses to aggressive interactions

Advantageous Inequity Aversion Does Not Always Exist: the Role of Determining Allocations Modulates Preferences for Advantageous Inequity

Which is More Important, Proposer Identity or Allocation Motive? Event-Related Potential in Economic Decision-Making

When the Counterpart Chooses the Opposite: the First Mover’s Anticipation and Evaluation of the Final Feedback in Gambles

In-group Favoritism or Black Sheep Effect? the Moderating Role of Norm Strength on Destination Residents' Responses Towards Deviant Behaviors

Victim Sensitivity and Proposal Size Modulate the Ingroup Favoritism During Fairness Norm Enforcement

You Did Not Mean It: Perceived Good Intentions Alleviate Sense of Unfairness

'(N)One of us but all of them!' Ingroup favouritism on individual and group levels in the context of deviant behaviour

Neural responses of in-group "favoritism" and out-group "discrimination" toward moral behaviors

Social Support Modulates Neural Responses to Unfairness in the Ultimatum Game.

The nasty neighbor effect in humans

Group Membership Modulates Fairness Consideration Among Deaf College Students—An Event-Related Potential Study

Determined by Myself or by My Group? Lay Theories of Agency and Favoritism in the Workplace

Affective divergence: Automatic responses to others' emotions depend on group membership.

Ingroup favoritism on perceived risk of infectious diseases

Deliberate or Unintended: Intentions Modulate Empathic Responses to Others’ Economic Payoffs in Social Interactions

Evolution of In-Group Favoritism.

Attentional variability and avoidance of hostile stimuli decrease aggression in Chinese male juvenile delinquents

Religious Identity, Between-Group Effects and Prosocial Behavior: Evidence from a Field Experiment in China

The effect of intentionality on reactive aggression：a rs-fMRI study on individual differences

Influence of Empathic Concern on Fairness-Related Decision Making: Evidence from ERP