Consensus of Chinese Specialists on Diagnosis and Treatment of Resistant Hypertension
Ning-Ling Sun,Yong Huo,Ji-Guang Wang,Nan-Fang Li,Jun Tao,Yong Li,Xiao-Wei Yan,Xiong-Jing Jiang,Xue-Wang Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.161395
IF: 6.133
2015-01-01
Chinese Medical Journal
Abstract:INTRODUCTION Resistant hypertension has become a challenge in the treatment of hypertension. As the population continues to age and obesity, sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome, and chronic kidney disease increase in incidence, resistant hypertension has become an increasingly common issue in clinical practice. Failure to control blood pressure can impair target organs such as the heart, brain, and kidney, facilitating the occurrence of clinical cardiovascular events. Therefore, positive and effective blood pressure control is an important part of the treatment of hypertension. Many factors may negatively affect blood pressure control, including unhealthy lifestyles, poor patient compliance, inadequate or substandard medication, and secondary hypertension. Effective diagnosis and rational medication are important in the control of resistant hypertension. The recent introduction of interventional treatment has provided a new opportunity to treat resistant hypertension. This article generalizes the clinical characteristics and diagnosis and evaluation methods of resistant hypertension as well as the therapeutic strategy for obtaining optimal control of blood pressure. By summarizing the current knowledge on resistant hypertension, we stress the importance of accurate diagnosis and treatment of resistant hypertension to further prevent, improve, and standardize the treatment of hypertension in China. DEFINITION OF RESISTANT HYPERTENSION Resistant hypertension is defined as blood pressure that cannot be effectively controlled by lifestyle changes and the concurrent administration of a rational, tolerable, and full dose of three or more types of antihypertensive drugs (including a diuretic) for more than 1-month or that can only be effectively controlled after the concurrent administration of four or more types of antihypertensive drugs.[123] EPIDEMIOLOGY AND MORBIDITY OF RESISTANT HYPERTENSION Since accurate epidemiological data on resistant hypertension cannot be obtained, the morbidity of resistant hypertension remains unclear. However, the ratios of patients whose blood pressure was uncontrolled in recent clinical trials are available for reference. When the ASCOT(Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial–Blood Pressure Lowering Arm) ended, the blood pressure of 47% of patients was uncontrolled (blood pressure of patients with diabetes: ≥130/80 mmHg; blood pressure of patients without diabetes: ≥140/90 mmHg).[4] When the ACCOMPLISH (Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through Combination Therapy in Patients Living with Systolic Hypertension) trial ended, the blood pressure of 26% of patients was uncontrolled (blood pressure of patients with or without diabetes: ≥140/90 mmHg).[5] Subjects enrolled in these two trials were patients with hypertension at high risk of cardiovascular disease. In these patients, the ratio of resistant hypertension may be relatively high. According to the scientific statement of the American Heart Association on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of resistant hypertension in 2008, a small sample study showed that the morbidity rate of patients with resistant hypertension in general outpatient clinics was approximately 5%.[1] CAUSES AND PATHOPHYSIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS OF RESISTANT HYPERTENSION Causes and pathophysiological mechanisms of resistant hypertension vary and include basic as well as central and local neurohumoral mechanisms. A high salt intake, obesity, and a reduced carotid baroreflex are the basic causes of uncontrolled blood pressure of patients with hypertension. In addition, due to activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) in the circulation and tissues and the excessively elevated activity of the sympathetic nerves in the central or local tissues (especially the kidney), inflammatory factors and oxidative stress are triggered, which facilitates the development and progress of arteriosclerosis and atherosclerosis as well as aggravates abnormalities in vascular structure and function. Thus, increased blood pressure is difficult to control. The persistently increased activity of the sympathetic nerves and RAAS is one of the factors in the pathogenesis of resistant hypertension.[6] Clinical and experimental data also show that multiple factors affect the activation of RAAS and the sympathetic nerves, including insulin resistance, adipocytokines, endothelial dysfunction, intermittent hypoxemia, volume overload, the effect of aldosterone on the central nervous system, and dysfunction of the arterial chemoreceptors and baroreceptors. The kidney plays an important role in the pathogenesis of resistant hypertension. Locally excessive activation of the renal sympathetic nerves is the basic cause and one of the important pathophysiological mechanisms of resistant hypertension. Renal sympathetic nerves include afferent and efferent fibers. Excessive activation of afferent fibers of the renal sympathetic nerves can enhance the activity of central sympathetic nervous system, which makes the systemic sympathetic nerves highly active and increases epinephrine release. Thus, structural and functional changes occur in the target organs including the kidneys, heart, and blood vessels. Finally, hypertension is persistent and progressive. Overexcitation of the efferent fibers of the renal sympathetic nerves can induce the excessive generation and secretion of noradrenaline, which causes renal vasoconstriction, reduces renal blood flow, and activates the renal and systemic RAAS. Furthermore, contractions of the afferent glomerular arterioles are stronger than those of the efferent glomerular arterioles, which decreases the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and increases water and sodium reabsorption. Meanwhile, stimulated granular cells release renin, which additionally activates RAAS. The pathophysiological procedure described above aggravates the blood pressure elevation and is involved in the persistence and progression of resistant hypertension.[789] DIAGNOSTIC METHODS OF RESISTANT HYPERTENSION Blood pressure measurement as a primary diagnostic method Based on the office blood pressure measurement (OBPM), the use of a continuous home blood pressure measurement (HBPM) and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is recommended to eliminate the white coat effect and understand the special forms of blood pressure (dipper type, nondipper type, extreme dipper type, morning surge, and morning hypertension).[10] Identify the causes of poor blood pressure control and eliminate pseudo resistant hypertension Incorrect blood pressure measurement: A common cause of pseudo-resistant hypertension. For example, diastolic pressure may be elevated when the patient has no back support while systolic pressure may be elevated with the legs crossed. Treatment compliance: Check whether the patient continues to take medicine according to the doctor's advice. Other medications: Check whether the patient is taking the medicines that may affect blood pressure. Lifestyle factors: High salt intake, over-anxiety, heavy smoking, severe obesity, chronic pain, etc. Treatment efficacy: Whether the use of anti-hypertensive drugs is not adequate (inadequate dose, lack of a diuretic, incorrect drug combination). Secondary hypertension causes: Seek clues for causes of secondary hypertension. IDENTIFICATION OF SECONDARY HYPERTENSION IN RESISTANT HYPERTENSION With the recent deeper recognition of hypertensive causes and improvement of clinical diagnosis techniques, the diagnostic rate of secondary hypertension is significantly increased. Secondary hypertension generally features a high or uncontrolled blood pressure despite a combination of multiple anti-hypertensive drugs. However, with an etiotropic treatment, blood pressure can be controlled or even returned to normal. Therefore, identifying secondary hypertension and giving corresponding treatment are steps used to control resistant hypertension. For all patients with resistant hypertension, potential secondary hypertension should be screened for by medical history, symptoms, signs, and routine laboratory examinations. Common types of secondary hypertension in resistant hypertension include: (1) Sleep apnea syndrome; (2) primary aldosteronism; (3) renal parenchymal hypertension; (4) renovascular hypertension; and (5) pheochromocytoma.Uncontrolled hypertension caused by mental factors should also be considered.Basic examinations commonly used in the identification of secondary hypertension include: Blood routine examination, urine routine examination, examinations of blood electrolytes, serum creatinine, blood glucose, 24-h urine sodium (Na) and potassium (K), and cardiac ultrasound, renal ultrasound; recording of height and weight, calculation of body mass index, and calculation of eGFR based on the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula. For patients with suspected secondary hypertension, special examinations should be further performed to avoid missed and incorrect diagnoses. However, excessive examinations should also be avoided. Special examinations mainly include: Renal artery ultrasound and computed tomography (CT); adrenal gland CT, determination of plasma aldosterone/renin and its ratio, and an aldosterone suppression or stimulation test; determination of blood and urine catecholamine levels as well as iodine131 – metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphic tracer; cortisol rhythm and dexamethasone suppression test; polysomnography; and psychological evaluation of patient when necessary. Special examinations should be performed according to the specific clinical manifestation of patients with hypertension and the basic clues provided by related laboratory examinations. These tests should be conducted around the suspected causes to prevent blind screening for secondary hypertension. For secondary hypertension with a clear cause, drugs, devices, and surgical treatment should be used to improve the effectiveness and cure rate of anti-hypertensive therapy. Diagnosing the cause is very important in the selection of a therapeutic strategy and determining the prognosis of patients with secondary hypertension. TREATMENT OF RESISTANT HYPERTENSION Therapeutic life change Corrective measures mainly include: Losing weight;[1112] moderate alcohol intake defined as no more than 2 cups/day for most men (no more than 300 ml of red wine, approximately 600 ml of beer) and half of that volume for women or underweight individuals;[13] limiting salt, defined as limiting recommended salt intake <6 g/d;[141516] eating a high-fiber and low-fat diet;[17] increasing physical activities consisting of aerobic exercise at a 50% maximal oxygen uptake for at least 30 min each day and being active as much as possible each week.[1819] Meanwhile, patients should pay attention to their mental regulation, reduce their mental stress, and keep psychological balance. Medication Principles In addition to therapeutic life change, the rational use of anti-hypertensive drugs should be considered. The drug selection process includes discontinuation of blood pressure–affecting drugs and the correct use of diuretics. A rational drug combination (including a single-pill stationary combination) is also necessary to achieve the maximum anti-hypertensive efficacy with minimal side effects. A long-acting preparation, for 24-h continuous anti-hypertensive efficacy should be used to effectively control nighttime blood pressure, morning blood pressure surge, and morning hypertension. Moreover, individually based principles should be observed, and applicable anti-hypertensive drugs should be used according to patients’ specific conditions and tolerance. Methods The combination use of three or more drugs with different antihypertensive mechanisms is required. A long-acting or fixed compound preparation should also be selected to reduce the dosing frequency and the number of pills. Whenever possible, the total daily drug amount should be divided into one or two doses (morning and night dose) to ensure all-day blood pressure control. Drugs that may affect anti-hypertensive efficacy should be avoided or reduced to a minimum, including nonnarcotic analgesics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (including aspirin), selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, sympathomimetic amines (decongestants, diet pills [sibutramine hydrochloride], cocaine), stimulants (methylphenidate, dexamphetamine, amphetamine, methamphetamine, modafinil), high alcohol intake, oral contraceptives, glucocorticoid, cyclosporine, erythropoietin, natural licorice, Chinese medicinal ingredients (ephedrine). Selection For patients with high renin and high sympathetic nerve activity (basic judgment criteria of heart rate and plasma renin activity), renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASI, angiotensin II receptor blocker [ARB] or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor [ACEI]), and β-receptor blocker should be mainly used as treatment. For patients with an increased volume (basic judgment criteria of high salt diet, elderly person in Northern China, or natriuresis over 24 h) and poor circulating renin-angiotensin system (RAS) level, a calcium channel blocker (CCB) and diuretic should usually be administered. Additionally, for those with a high salt intake, the dosage of thiazide be appropriately increased while a strict salt limit is emphasized. For patients with an eGFR ≤30 mg·min-1·1.73 m-2, a loop diuretic should be used. For nondialysis patients with renal insufficiency, due to the limited usage or dosage of RASIs, the CCB dosage should be increased, and a dihydropyridine and a nondihydropyridine CCB can even be combined. For obese patients, the dosage of RASIs should be increased.[20] For elderly patients or those with an elevated systolic pressure, the CCB dosage should be increased. The most commonly used three-drug combination consisted of RASI, CCB, and thiazide diuretic are recommended. If the target blood pressure still cannot be achieved, additional spironolactone (risk assessment on kidney function and potential hyperkalemia is required), or combination with a β-receptor blocker, an α-β receptor blocker, or an α-receptor blocker can be considered. When the blood pressure remains uncontrolled, central nervous system depressants (clonidine, reserpine, etc.) can be selected as the fifth anti-hypertensive drug in the drug combination regimen. Anti-hypertensive drug use principles The three-drug combination of RASI (ARB or ACEI), CCB, and thiazide diuretic should be used as the basic medication for resistant hypertension. This combination is rational in principle and useful for the treatment of most patients with hypertension. If the blood pressure remains uncontrolled after this treatment, combination of other anti-hypertensive drugs (including a β-receptor blocker, an α-β receptor blocker, or an α-receptor blocker plus an aldosterone antagonist) can also be used according to the clinical characteristics of the individual patient. The procedure of medication is shown in Figure 1. Figure 1: Medication for resistant hypertension. *Blood pressure target: <140/90 mmHg. CCB: Calcium channel blocker; RASI: Renin-angiotensin system inhibitor; ARB: Angiotensin II receptor blocker; ACEI: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor.In the three-drug combination, drug dosage should be conventional or double the tolerated dose. For the selection of a multi-drug combination, the one with efficacy overlapping, few adverse reactions, and high compliance should be recommended under the direction of experienced specialist physicians. Evaluation of treatment compliance During the drug adjustment period, a follow-up visit should occur every 2–4 weeks. Get to know the drug type(s), dosage, and dosing frequency and time by talking with the patient and family member(s). Calculate the patient's compliance according to the prescribed dosage of each time and the medication frequency. Listening to the patient's complaints and adjusting the regimen accordingly is an effective way to improve treatment compliance. Monitoring heart rate (for those taking a β-receptor blocker), blood pressure changes upon standing (for those taking an α-receptor blocker), or changes in serum uric acid and potassium (for those taking a diuretic) is another way to determine the patient's treatment compliance. Drug therapeutic effect and safety evaluation In addition to OBPM, HBPM, and ABPM should be combined to evaluate the anti-hypertensive efficacy. According to the dosing frequency and time, determine HBPM frequency and time. Patients with significant blood pressure fluctuations should be advised to take and record their blood pressures before taking medicine in the morning, afternoon, evening, and before going to bed and take the records with them to doctor visits. If OBPM is not consistent with HBPM or the blood pressure fluctuations are significant, it becomes necessary to determine the nighttime and all-day blood pressure stabilities; in such cases, a 24–48 h ABPM is recommended. Learn about the patient's discomfort, especially postural dizziness and amaurosis, as well as their drug tolerance and adverse reactions. For patients with impaired renal function who are treated with RASI, an aldosterone antagonist, or a combination treatment with a loop diuretic, serum potassium, and serum creatinine must be regularly monitored and the eGFR should be calculated. Invasive interventional therapy Since the cardiovascular risk for patients with resistant hypertension increases significantly, blood pressure control has been an important part and target in treatment. After the standard and rational intensive treatment intervention for patients with resistant hypertension, blood pressure control remains unsatisfactory in some patients. In recent years, as a model of interventional treatment, renal denervation (RDN) has gradually attracted worldwide attention with the promise of the development of a novel therapy for patients with resistant hypertension that is poorly controlled with drugs. Since excessive activation of the renal sympathetic nerve has been an important pathological and physiological basis of hypertension onset and maintenance and renal sympathetic nerve fibers mainly access the kidneys through the renal artery adventitia, such anatomical characteristics determine that RDN could selectively denervate most of the renal sympathetic nerve fibers. Energy is released through the radiofrequency catheter inserted into the renal artery, and through the inner medium membranes of the renal artery and a portion of the renal sympathetic nerve fibers is selectively destroyed, which reduces renal sympathetic nerve activity.[21] Several recent small sample prospective studies (Symplicity HTN-1, Symplicity HTN-2, etc.)[222324] showed that after RDN therapy, most patients with resistant hypertension responded to the treatment in the short- and medium-term (defined as a decrease in systolic blood pressure in OBPM ≥10 mmHg after therapy) without evident procedural complications, after which the antihypertensive drugs doses were somewhat reduced (however, some of the patients were still in need of multi-antihypertensive drugs to control their blood pressure). This method may possibly have some efficacy for conditions involving excessive sympathetic nerve activation such as insulin resistance, sleep apnea syndrome, ventricular arrhythmia, and chronic kidney disease. However, in the Symplicity HTN-3 trial, no significant decrease in blood pressure was observed after RDN therapy.[25] It remains necessary to carry out targeted research in the larger scale and perform longer-term follow-up visits to determine RDN effectiveness and safety. For those patients with true resistant hypertension confirmed by a clinical diagnosis, who could not tolerate multiple antihypertensive drug combination treatment, or with hypertension and poor compliance, after a strict evaluation, RDN implantation with patient consent could be considered.[26] CLINICAL ADVICE FOR RESISTANT HYPERTENSION For the determination of blood pressure level in patients with resistant hypertension, OBPM should be used in combination with HBPM and 24-h ABPM. Accordingly, patients whose blood pressure level remains above the target level after combination treatment with more than three kinds of medicines (including a diuretic) at optimal doses and formulations for at least 1-month could be diagnosed with resistant hypertension. For patients with resistant hypertension, the rationality and compliance of anti-hypertensive medicine treatment should be assessed, and the primary and secondary factors resulting in the poor control of blood pressure should also been screened and identified to enable the detection of true resistant hypertension. For patients with resistant hypertension and impairment of multiple organs and the co-existence of various diseases such as diabetes, heart failure, coronary heart disease, cerebral apoplexy, and chronic kidney diseases, it is necessary to comprehensively intervene multiple risk factors and more actively control the blood pressure. While medicines are taken to control blood pressure, it is necessary to adhere to the intensified lifestyle treatment, mainly including limiting salt, performing aerobic exercise, quitting smoking, and losing weight. Use the optimized drug combination (CCB + RASI + diuretic) and the optimal tolerable doses for treatment. Accordingly, if the blood pressure still fails to be controlled at the target level, aldosterone antagonists (renal function permitting) or a β-blocker, an α-β blocker, or an α-blocker and central nervous system antagonists could be further applied according to the patient's individual clinical conditions. With the instructions from professional hypertensive physicians and their diagnosis and treatment, for those patients diagnosed with resistant hypertension and poor drug control, or those with resistant hypertension who are incapable of tolerating more than four kinds of medicines for treatment (very poor treatment compliance) and are at high cardiovascular risk, on the basis of sufficient informed consent, RDN treatment may be considered. However, since RDN remains in the research stage and long-term follow-up visit data are still lacking in China, it is necessary to cautiously, discreetly, and strictly observe the operation procedures before carrying out RDN treatment. Figure 2 shows the procedure of diagnosis and treatment.Figure 2: Diagnosis and treatment of resistant hypertension. HBPM: Home blood pressure measurement; ABPM: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; OBPM: Office blood pressure measurement; RDN: Renal denervation. CONCLUSIONS Resistant hypertension is a hypertensive phenomenon that results in the progression of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Definite diagnosis and effective treatment are of the utmost importance. However, it is necessary to carefully discriminate the pathogenesis, among which, insufficient and irrational drug treatment doses, improper drug application time, a harmful lifestyle, and poor treatment compliance, etc., are all important factors. Secondary hypertension would also lead to uncontrolled blood pressure. ABPM and HBPM are crucial to clearly defining the blood pressure levels of patients with resistant hypertension. Therefore, they should serve as important diagnostic methods. Strict lifestyle interventions could improve blood pressure while rational, optimal multi-drug combinations (including a diuretic) at tolerable doses is the key to controlling blood pressure. In the combination, the application of diuretic, spironolactone, and an α-β blocker as well as a central nervous system antagonist could not be ignored. For patients with true resistant hypertension that is unresponsive to drugs, interventional RDN is a possible treatment method. However, since it remains in the research stage, it is necessary to strictly select indications for and discreetly and sequentially perform the operation according to standard protocols. Planned prospective studies are also encouraged. Consensus Specialists Li-Sheng Liu, Hai-Yan Wang, Run-Lin Gao, Lu-Yuan Chen, Ji-Yan Chen, Yun-Dai Chen, Ping-Jin Gao, Jun-Bo Ge, Yong Huo, Xiong-Jing Jiang, Hong-Wei Li, Nan-Fang Li, Xue-Wang Li, Yong Li, Cheng-Zhi Lu, Jian-Jun Mu, Yi-Pu Chen, Ning-Ling Sun, Jun Tao, Ji-Guang Wang, Jian-An Wang, Wei-Min Wang, Wen Wang, Yu Wang, Hai-Ying Wu, Zhao-Su Wu, Liang-Di Xie, Xiao-Wei Yan, Chun-Yu Zeng, Shu-Yang Zhang, Yu-Qing Zhang, Lian-You Zhao, Zhi-Ming Zhu, Yang Xi, Wei Ma
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
-
Mean systolic blood pressure above the control threshold in people with treated uncontrolled hypertension: a pooled, cross-sectional analysis of 55 national health surveys
Rodrigo M. Carrillo-Larco,Wilmer Cristobal Guzman-Vilca,Xiaolin Xu,Antonio Bernabe-Ortiz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101833
IF: 15.1
2023-01-01
EClinicalMedicine
Abstract:Background The hypertension care cascade has been characterized worldwide, yet it has not been quantified how far above the blood pressure control threshold people with uncontrolled treated hypertension are. We summarized the mean systolic blood pressure (SBP; mmHg) in people treated for hypertension but SBP not <130/80.Methods We did a cross-sectional analysis of 55 WHO STEPS Surveys (n = 10,658), comprising six world regions (Africa, Americas, Eastern Mediterranean, Europe, Southeast Asia and Western Pacific); we only included the most recent survey by country regardless of when it was conducted. Adults, men and women, aged between 25 and 69 years, with self-reported hypertension receiving antihypertensive medication and whose blood pressure was >130/80 mmHg were included. We quantified the mean SBP overall and by socio-demographic (sex, age, urban/rural location, education) and cardiometabolic (current smoking, self-reported diabetes) risk factors.Findings The lowest SBP was observed in Kuwait (146.6; 95% CI: 143.8-149.4 mmHg) and the highest in Libya (171.9; 95% CI: 167.8-176.0 mmHg). In 29 countries, the SBP was higher in men, and SBP tended to be higher in older groups except in six countries. In 17 countries, the SBP was higher in rural than in urban sites, for example in Turkmenistan the SBP was 162.3 (95% CI: 158.4-166.2) mmHg in rural versus 151.6 (95% CI: 148.7-154.4) mmHg in urban areas. In 25 countries, the SBP was higher in adults with no education, for example in Benin the SBP in people without formal education was 175.3 (95% CI: 168.8-181.9) mmHg versus 156.4 (95% CI: 148.8-164.0) mmHg in people with higher education. Interpretation Stronger interventions to improve and secure access to effective management are needed in most countries and specific groups, to reach hypertension control in people with hypertension already receiving antihy-pertensive medication.
-
Analyze The Causes And Composition Ratio Of 3,081 Patients With Secondary Hypertension
Wang Meng-Lin,Hai-Ying Zhao,Dan-Dan Tian,Min Liu,Ling Li,Ling Jiang,Shu-Xian Cui,Man He-Lian,Shan-Shan Wang,Cai-Ni Fan,Fan-Shen Meng,Xin-Yu Wang,Hao Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0000548737.27612.24
IF: 4.9
2018-01-01
Journal of Hypertension
Abstract:Objectives: We aim to analyze the causes and distribution of 3,081 patients with secondary hypertension among 8,942 patients hospitalized to provide pathological reference for prevention and treatment of hyperten Methods: A retrospective study was performed to analyze the 3,081 patients with secondary hypertension among 8,942 patients diagnosed hypertension who were hospitalized in hypertension department of Henan Province People's Hospital in recent 5 years. Results: Of the 8,942 patients surveyed, 5468 (61.15%) were males, and 3474 (38.85%) were females. Overall, 3081 (34.46%) were diagnosed secondary hypertension,of which 1720 (55.83%) were males and 1361 (44.17%) were females. Of these, 2550 cases had one cause, 496 cases had two causes, 34 cases had three causes, and 1 patient had four causes. Secondary hypertension with the highest prevalence were psychological hypertension (1477; 16.52%); obstructive sleep apnea (872; 9.75%); primary aldosteronism (657; 7.35%); renal artery stenosis (496, 5.55%); aortic coarctation (48; 0.54%); glaucoma (41; 0.46%); pheochromocytoma (28; 0.31%); renal hypertension (20; 0.22%);17a-hydroxylase deficiency (4; 0.04%); Cushing syndrome (3; 0.03%); Liddle syndrome (1, 0.01%)and reninoma (1; 0.01%). Conclusion: The study, secondary hypertension 34.46% was far more than 5% in previous data. The reasons:1. Comprehensive screening tests for secondary causes of hypertension were conducted on all patients.;2.Moderate-to-severe hypertension took a large amount of patients hospitalized in hypertension department;3. psychological factors took large responsibilities for secondary hypertension that has been recognized in recent years. Patients should conduct screening tests for secondary hypertension to improve the quality of diagnosis and treatment.
-
Diagnosis and management of resistant hypertension
Miguel Camafort,Reinhold Kreutz,Myeong-Chan Cho
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321730
IF: 5.7
2024-10-28
Heart
Abstract:Resistant hypertension is a condition where blood pressure levels remain elevated above target despite changes in lifestyle and concurrent use of at least three antihypertensive agents, including a long-acting calcium channel blocker (CCB), a blocker of the renin-angiotensin system (ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker) and a diuretic. To be diagnosed as resistant hypertension, maintaining adherence to therapy is required along with confirmation of blood pressure levels above target by out-of-office blood pressure measurements and exclusion of secondary causes of hypertension. The key management points of this condition include lifestyle changes such as reduced sodium and alcohol intake, regular physical activity, weight loss and discontinuation of substances that can interfere with blood pressure control. It is also recommended that current treatment be rationalised, including single pill combination treatment where antihypertensive drugs should be provided at the maximum tolerated dose. It is further recommended that current drugs be replaced with a more appropriate and less difficult treatment regimen based on the patient's age, ethnicity, comorbidities and risk of drug-drug interactions. The fourth line of treatment for patients with resistant hypertension should include mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists such as spironolactone, as demonstrated in the PATHWAY-2 trial and meta-analyses. Alternatives to spironolactone include amiloride, doxazosin, eplerenone, clonidine and beta-blockers, as well as any other antihypertensive drugs not already in use. New approaches under research are selective non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists such as finerenone, esaxerenone and ocedurenone, selective aldosterone synthase inhibitors such as baxdrostat, and dual endothelin antagonist aprocitentan.
-
Medical Measures in Hypertensives Considered Resistant
Fadl Elmula M Fadl Elmula,Julian Eek Mariampillai,Sondre Heimark,Sverre E Kjeldsen,Michel Burnier
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpad118
2024-04-15
Abstract:Background: Patients with resistant hypertension are the group of hypertensive patients with the highest cardiovascular risk. Methods: All rules and guidelines for treatment of hypertension should be followed strictly to obtain blood pressure (BP) control in resistant hypertension. The mainstay of treatment of hypertension, also for resistant hypertension, is pharmacological treatment, which should be tailored to each patient's specific phenotype. Therefore, it is pivotal to assess nonadherence to pharmacological treatment as this remains the most challenging problem to investigate and manage in the setting of resistant hypertension. Results: Once adherence has been confirmed, patients must be thoroughly worked-up for secondary causes of hypertension. Until such possible specific causes have been clarified, the diagnosis is apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (TRH). Surprisingly few patients remain with true TRH when the various secondary causes and adherence problems have been detected and resolved. Refractory hypertension is a term used to characterize the treatment resistance in hypertensive patients using ≥5 antihypertensive drugs. All pressor mechanisms may then need blockage before their BPs are reasonably controlled. Conclusions: Patients with resistant hypertension need careful and sustained follow-up and review of their medications and dosages at each term since medication adherence is a very dynamic process.
-
Pathoaetiology, Epidemiology and Diagnosis of Hypertension
Morris J. Brown,Stephen Haydock
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200059002-00001
2000-01-01
Drugs
Abstract:Hypertension is currently defined in terms of levels of blood pressure associated with increased cardiovascular risk. A cut-off of 140/90mm Hg is accepted as a threshold level above which treatment should at least be considered. This would give a prevalence of hypertension of about 20% of the adult population in most developed countries. Hypertension is associated with increased risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease and renal impairment. Hypertension results from the complex interaction of genetic factors and environmental influences. Many of the genetic factors remain to be discovered, but environmental influences such as salt intake, diet and alcohol form the basis of nonpharmacological methods of blood pressure reduction.Investigation of the individual hypertensive patient aims to identify possible secondary causes of hypertension and also to assess the individual’s overall cardiovascular risk, which determines the need for prompt and aggressive therapy. Cardiovascular risk can be determined from (i) target organ damage to the eyes, heart and kidneys; (ii) other medical conditions associated with increased risk; and (iii) lifestyle factors such as obesity and smoking. Secondary causes of hypertension are individually rare. Screening tests should be initially simple, with more expensive and invasive tests reserved for those in whom a secondary cause is suspected or who have atypical features to their presentation.The main determinants of blood pressure are cardiac output and peripheral resistance. The typical haemodynamic finding in patients with established hypertension is of normal cardiac output and increased peripheral resistance. Treatment of hypertension should initially use nonpharmacological methods. Selection of initial drug therapy should be based upon the strength of evidence for reduction of cardiovascular mortality in controlled clinical trials, and should also take into account coexisting medical conditions that favour or limit the usefulness of any given drug. Given this approach, it would be reasonable to use a thiazide diuretic and/or a β-blocker as first-line therapy unless there are indications to the contrary. Individual response to given drug classes is highly variable and is related to the underlying variability in the abnormal pathophysiology.There are data to suggest that the renin-angiotensin system is more important in young patients. The targeting of this system in patients under the age of 50 years with a β-blocker (or ACE inhibitor), and the use of a thiazide diuretic (or calcium antagonist) in patients over 50 years, may enable blood pressure to be controlled more quickly.
pharmacology & pharmacy,toxicology
-
Resistant hypertension: diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment a clinical consensus statement from the Thai hypertension society
Pairoj Chattranukulchai,Weranuj Roubsanthisuk,Sirisawat Kunanon,Praew Kotruchin,Bancha Satirapoj,Nattawut Wongpraparut,Sarat Sunthornyothin,Apichard Sukonthasarn
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-024-01785-6
Abstract:Resistant hypertension (RH) includes hypertensive patients with uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) while receiving ≥3 BP-lowering medications or with controlled BP while receiving ≥4 BP-lowering medications. The exact prevalence of RH is challenging to quantify. However, a reasonable estimate of true RH is around 5% of the hypertensive population. Patients with RH have higher cardiovascular risk as compared with hypertensive patients in general. Standardized office BP measurement, confirmation of medical adherence, search for drug- or substance-induced BP elevation, and ambulatory or home BP monitoring are mandatory to exclude pseudoresistance. Appropriate further investigations, guided by clinical data, should be pursued to exclude possible secondary causes of hypertension. The management of RH includes the intensification of lifestyle interventions and the modification of antihypertensive drug regimens. The essential aspects of lifestyle modification include sodium restriction, body weight control, regular exercise, and healthy sleep. Step-by-step adjustment of the BP-lowering drugs based on the available evidence is proposed. The suitable choice of diuretics according to patients' renal function is presented. Sacubitril/valsartan can be carefully substituted for the prior renin-angiotensin system blockers, especially in those with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. If BP remains uncontrolled, device therapy such as renal nerve denervation should be considered. Since device-based treatment is an invasive and costly procedure, it should be used only after careful and appropriate case selection. In real-world practice, the management of RH should be individualized depending on each patient's characteristics.
-
What is resistant arterial hypertension?
Evgeniya V. Shalaeva,Franz H. Messerli
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2023.2185457
2023-03-10
Blood Pressure
Abstract:The current review is to describe the definition and prevalence of resistant arterial hypertension (RAH), the difference between refractory hypertension, patient characteristics and major risk factors for RAH, how RAH is diagnosed, prognosis and outcomes for patients. According to the WHO, approximately 1.28 billion adults aged 30–79 worldwide have arterial hypertension, and over 80% of them do not have blood pressure (BP) under control. RAH is defined as above-goal elevated BP despite the concurrent use of 3 or more classes of antihypertensive drugs, commonly including a long-acting calcium channel blocker, an inhibitor of the renin-angiotensin system (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker), and a thiazide diuretic administered at maximum or maximally tolerated doses and at appropriate dosing frequency. RAH occurs in nearly 1 of 6 hypertensive patients. It often remains unrecognised mainly because patients are not prescribed ≥3 drugs at maximal doses despite uncontrolled BP. RAH distinctly increases the risk of developing coronary artery disease, heart failure, stroke and chronic kidney disease and confers higher rates of major adverse cardiovascular events as well as increased all-cause mortality. Timely diagnosis and treatment of RAH may mitigate the associated risks and improve short and long-term prognosis. Resistant arterial hypertension is a serious condition that leads to severe cardiovascular complications, such as heart attack, stroke and death. It is defined as above-goal elevated blood pressure despite the concurrent use of 3 or more classes of antihypertensive medications administered at maximum or maximally tolerated doses and at appropriate dosing frequency. Non-adherence to antihypertensive medications must be excluded before resistant arterial hypertension is diagnosed. Blood pressure should be measured appropriately. A person should sit in a comfortable chair with back supported, both feet flat on the ground, and legs uncrossed for at least 5 min before blood pressure measurement. A cuff length is supposed to be at least 80% and a width of at least 40% of the arm circumference. Placing the cuff directly on the skin of the upper arm at the level of the heart. Obtaining 3 readings 1 min apart. Discarding the first reading and taking the mean of the second and third readings Resistant arterial hypertension should be distinguished from refractory hypertension, when blood pressure remains uncontrolled on maximal or near-maximal therapy of 5 or more antihypertensive agents of different classes.
peripheral vascular disease
-
Controversies in Hypertension V: Resistant and Refractory Hypertension
Edward J Filippone,Gerald V Naccarelli,Andrew J Foy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2023.09.015
Abstract:Apparent resistant hypertension, defined as uncontrolled office blood pressure despite ≥ 3 antihypertensive medications including a diuretic or use of ≥ 4 medications regardless of blood pressure, occurs in ≤ 15% of treated hypertensives. Apparent refractory hypertension, defined as uncontrolled office pressure despite use of 5 or more medications including a diuretic, occurs in ≤ 10% of resistant cases. Both are associated with increased comorbidity and enhanced cardiovascular risk. To rule out pseudo-resistant or pseudo-refractory hypertension, employ guideline-based methodology for obtaining pressure, maximize the regimen, rule out white-coat effect, and assess adherence. True resistant hypertension is characterized by volume overload and aldosterone excess, refractory by enhanced sympathetic tone. Spironolactone is the preferred agent for resistance, with lower doses. Spironolactone, potassium binders, or both, are preferred if the estimated glomerular filtration rate is below 45. If significant albuminuria, finerenone is indicated. The optimal treatment of refractory hypertension is unclear, but sympathetic inhibition (α-β blockade, centrally acting sympathoinhibitors, or both) seems reasonable. Renal denervation has shown minimal benefit for resistance, but its role in refractory hypertension remains to be defined.
-
Prevalence, Clinical Characteristics, and Treatment of Patients with Resistant Hypertension: A Single-Center Study
Stefan Naydenov,Emil Manov,Nikolay Runev
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11090279
2024-09-05
Abstract:Background: Resistant hypertension (HTN) is associated with a high risk of cardiovascular complications. Our study aimed to assess the prevalence, characteristics, and treatment of patients with resistant HTN. Methods: We screened 4340 consecutive cardiovascular patients hospitalized in our clinic and identified 3762 with HTN. Of them, 128 fulfilled criteria for resistant HTN and were included in our study. We matched these patients to 128 hospitalized patients with controlled HTN. Results: Resistant HTN patients comprised 3.4% of all hypertensive individuals. Most of these patients (67.2%) were at high or very high cardiovascular risk compared to controlled HTN patients (40.6%); p < 0001. Resistant HTN patients more commonly had concomitant chronic kidney disease (CKD) (60.9%), overweight/obesity (52.3%), dyslipidemias (35.2%), smoking (27.3%), and diabetes (21.9%) compared to controlled HTN patients (37.5%, 29.7%, 28.1%, 14.1%, and 7.8%, respectively); p < 0.001. Regression analysis showed the strongest association of resistant HTN with CKD (OR 6.64), stage III HTN (OR 3.07), and obesity/overweight (OR 2.60). In contrast, single-pill combinations (SPCs) were associated with a lower likelihood of uncontrolled HTN (OR 0.58). Conclusions: Resistant HTN represented a small proportion of all hypertensives in our study, but it was characterized by high/very high cardiovascular risk. Optimized therapy including increased use of SPCs could improve blood pressure control and long-term prognosis for these patients.
-
When blood pressure refuses to budge: exploring the complexity of resistant hypertension
Meeti Keyur Champaneria,Rushi Sanjaykumar Patel,Terry L. Oroszi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1211199
IF: 3.6
2023-06-22
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Abstract:Resistant hypertension, defined as blood pressure that remains above goal despite using three or more antihypertensive medications, including a diuretic, affects a significant proportion of the hypertensive population and is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Despite the availability of a wide range of pharmacological therapies, achieving optimal blood pressure control in patients with resistant hypertension remains a significant challenge. However, recent advances in the field have identified several promising treatment options, including spironolactone, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and renal denervation. In addition, personalized management approaches based on genetic and other biomarkers may offer new opportunities to tailor therapy and improve outcomes. This review aims to provide an overview of the current state of knowledge regarding managing resistant hypertension, including the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical implications of the condition, as well as the latest developments in therapeutic strategies and future prospects.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
-
RESISTANT HYPERTENSION: WHEN DRUG THERAPY IS THE CULPRIT
Ilaria Ambrosino,Giulia Rivasi,Marco Capacci,Ludovica Ceolin,Lorenza Rossi,Francesca Bisignano,Alessandra Liccardo,Giuseppe D’Ambrosio,Greta Ceccarelli,Andrea Ungar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0001022228.56019.71
IF: 4.9
2024-05-01
Journal of Hypertension
Abstract:Objective: Resistant Hypertension is not uncommon in clinical practice. The causal role of medical therapy is often underestimated. Design and method: We describe a case of (pseudo)Resistant Hypertension where medications contributed to (pseudo)resistance. Results: An 83-year-old male patient was referred to our Hypertension Clinic in July 2020 for poor blood pressure (BP) control despite polytherapy (Valsartan 320 mg/die, Nebivolol 5 mg/die, Doxazosin 4 mg/die, Clonidine patch 5 mg/die, Lercanidipine 20 mg). Medical history included recent stroke (June 2020), hypercholesterolemia, hyperuricemia, hypothyroidism, and previous right nephrectomy for renal carcinoma (2010), on treatment with the Tyr-kinase receptor inhibitor Sunitinib (2 weeks/month) at the time of assessment. He reported a recent Emergency Department visit for high BP (210/105 mmHg), with no target organ damage. Mean home BP was 160/70 mmHg. Lercanidipine was stopped due to poor tolerability (ankle swelling) and Canrenone 50 mg/die was introduced. A month later, 24-hours Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) showed persistence of inadequate BP control (mean 24h BP 151/68 mmHg, mean daytime BP 152/70 mmHg). As Doxazosin (α1-receptors antagonist) and Clonidine (α2-receptors agonist) both act on alfa-adrenergic receptors, but in opposite way, Doxazosin was progressively reduced and then withdrawn, with subsequent improvement of BP control. However, high BP variability persisted. Home BP diary showed higher values while on Sunitinib treatment and lower BP during washout periods (Figure 1). Indeed, Sunitinib is associated with a 15-25% incidence of hypertension. Moreover, some studies demonstrate a correlation between Sunitinib treatment and marked BP increases. Therefore, patient's treatment was modulated increasing BP medications during Sunitinib cycles and reducing antihypertensive treatment intensity during washout periods. Conclusions: The present case report highlights the clinical relevance of iatrogenic resistant hypertension, that is often overlooked in clinical practice, particularly if related to non-routine medications, e.g. antiangiogenic agents. Moreover, this case report draws attention to pseudoresistant hypertension caused by inappropriate antihypertensive associations such as Doxazosin and Clonidine. Indeed, these drugs are highly specific for α1 and α2-receptors, respectively, but they can also bind other receptor subclasses, thus potentially interfering each other due to competitive binding.
peripheral vascular disease
-
Resistant Hypertension in Dialysis: Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Management
Panagiotis I Georgianos,Rajiv Agarwal,Panagiotis I. Georgianos
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.0000000000000315
IF: 14.978
2024-01-16
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Abstract:Apparent treatment-resistant hypertension is defined as an elevated BP despite the use of ≥3 antihypertensive medications from different classes or the use of ≥4 antihypertensives regardless of BP levels. Among patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis, using this definition, the prevalence of apparent treatment-resistant hypertension is estimated to be between 18% and 42%. Owing to the lack of a rigorous assessment of some common causes of pseudoresistance, the burden of true resistant hypertension in the dialysis population remains unknown. What distinguishes apparent treatment-resistance from true resistance is white-coat hypertension and adherence to medications. Accordingly, the diagnostic workup of a dialysis patient with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension on dialysis includes the accurate determination of BP control status with the use of home or ambulatory BP monitoring and exclusion of nonadherence to the prescribed antihypertensive regimen. In a patient on dialysis with inadequately controlled BP, despite adherence to therapy with maximally tolerated doses of a β -blocker, a long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, and a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor, volume-mediated hypertension is the most important treatable cause of resistance. In daily clinical practice, such patients are often managed with intensification of antihypertensive therapy. However, this therapeutic strategy is likely to fail if volume overload is not adequately recognized or treated. Instead of increasing the number of prescribed BP-lowering medications, we recommend diet and dialysate restricted in sodium to facilitate achievement of dry weight. The achievement of dry weight is facilitated by an adequate time on dialysis of at least 4 hours for delivering an adequate dialysis dose. In this article, we review the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of resistant hypertension among patients on dialysis.
urology & nephrology
-
[Secondary hypertension: diagnosis and treatment]
Paolo Verdecchia,Gianpaolo Reboldi,Giovanni Mazzotta,Martina Zappa,Fabio Angeli
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1714/4318.43040
Abstract:Hypertension does not recognize obvious pathogenic causes in the majority of patients (essential hypertension). However, a secondary underlying cause of hypertension can be recognized in 5-10% of unselected hypertensive patients, and this prevalence may increase to more than 20% in patients with hypertension that is difficult to control or frankly resistant to treatment. In children, secondary hypertension is most often due to aortic coarctation, distal thoracic or abdominal aortic stenosis, or specific gene mutations. In adults or elderly individuals, secondary hypertension is most often due to atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis, primary hyperaldosteronism, and Cushing's disease or syndrome. Parenchymal nephropathy and hyperparathyroidism can cause hypertension at all ages, while pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma tend to occur more often in adolescents or young adults. In general, secondary hypertension should be suspected in subjects with: (a) onset of hypertension under 30 years of age especially if in the absence of hypertensive family history or other risk factors for hypertension; (b) treatment-resistant hypertension; c) severe hypertension (>180/110 mmHg), malignancy, or hypertensive emergencies; d) rapid rise in blood pressure values in previously well controlled patients. Any clinical signs suspicious or suggestive of hypertension from endocrine causes, a "reverse dipping" or "non-dipping'" profile at 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring not justified by other factors, signs of obvious organ damage may be helpful clues for diagnosis. Finally, patients snoring or with clear sleep apnea should also be considered for possible secondary hypertension.
-
Resistant hypertension: Diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment practical approach
Roberto Parodi,Laura Brandani,César Romero,Manuel Klein
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2023.12.026
IF: 7.749
2024-01-01
European Journal of Internal Medicine
Abstract:The term RH describes a subgroup of hypertensive patients whose BP is uncontrolled despite the use of at least three antihypertensive drugs in an appropriate combination at optimal or best tolerated doses. True RH is considered when appropriate lifestyle measures and treatment with optimal or best tolerated doses of three or more drugs (a thiazide/thiazide-like diuretic, plus renin-angiotensin system -RAS- blocker and a calcium channel blocker -CCB-) fail to lower office BP to <140/90 mmHg; besides the inadequate BP control should be confirmed by home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) or 24-hour ambulatory; and evidence of adherence to therapy and exclusion of secondary causes of hypertension are required. RH patients are at a high risk of cardiovascular events and death. RH is associated with a higher prevalence of end-organ damage. When stricter criteria are applied, a reasonable estimate of the prevalence of true RH is 5 % of the total hypertensive population. The predominant hemodynamic pattern appears to be increased systemic vascular resistance and plasma volume with normal or even low cardiac output. We must rule out pseudo-resistance before diagnosing true drug resistance. RH is a therapeutic challenge, and its management includes lifestyle interventions, avoiding nonadherence to treatment, avoiding inertia, appropriate use of antihypertensive drugs based on current evidence, especially long-acting diuretics, and the addition of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. RCTs to identify the most protective medical therapy in RH are needed. A series of drugs in different stages of investigation could significantly impact RH treatment in the future.
medicine, general & internal
-
Resistant Hypertension in Adults With Type 1 or 2 Diabetes: A Structured Diagnostic Approach
Philip A McFarlane
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2018.01.001
Abstract:People with diabetes often have difficulty reaching their blood pressure targets and are labelled as having resistant hypertension. Clinicians often move quickly to screen such people for secondary causes of hypertension; however, such causes are rare, and resistant hypertension usually has other explanations that are significantly more common. By using a structured approach to resistant hypertension, clinicians can assist patients to reach their target blood pressure levels. Step 1 is to determine out-of-office blood pressure measurements using home or ambulatory blood pressure monitors. Step 2 is to determine the level of adherence to prescribed medications. Step 3 is to identify interfering substances. Step 4 is to check that the prescribed medications are synergistic and optimally dosed. Finally, if all other steps fail to get patients to their blood pressure targets, we consider possible secondary causes of hypertension. This approach is particularly useful in helping people with diabetes to reach their blood pressure targets.
-
Prevalence and prognosis of refractory hypertension diagnosed using ambulatory blood pressure measurements
Minjae Yoon,Seng Chan You,Jaewon Oh,Chan Joo Lee,Sang-Hak Lee,Seok-Min Kang,Sungha Park
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-021-00845-5
Abstract:The prognosis of refractory hypertension is largely unknown due to its low prevalence. This study aimed to investigate the prognosis of refractory hypertension and compare it with those of resistant and nonresistant hypertension. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 16,284 participants with hypertension who underwent ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring between 2012 and 2019 at a tertiary center. Uncontrolled BP was defined as a 24-h BP ≥ 130/80 mmHg as assessed by ambulatory BP monitoring. Resistant hypertension was defined as uncontrolled BP despite the use of three antihypertensive medications, including a diuretic or the use of ≥4 drugs regardless of BP control. Refractory hypertension was defined as uncontrolled BP despite the use of ≥5 antihypertensive medications. Among 16,284 patients with hypertension (mean age 59.2 ± 15.5 years, 52.7% men), 1501 (9.2%) and 150 (0.9%) patients had resistant and refractory hypertension, respectively. The prevalence of chronic kidney disease, end-stage renal disease, heart failure, previous stroke, left ventricular hypertrophy, and the riser/nondipper patterns of circadian BP rhythm progressively increased from patients with nonresistant hypertension to patients with resistant hypertension to patients with refractory hypertension. During a median follow-up of 3.9 years, the risk of cardiovascular mortality progressively increased from patients with nonresistant hypertension to patients with resistant hypertension (hazard ratio 1.62, 95% confidence interval 1.16-2.26) to patients with refractory hypertension (hazard ratio 5.22, 95% confidence interval 3.04-8.96). In conclusion, refractory hypertension, defined as uncontrolled ambulatory BP levels, was associated with a higher risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality than nonresistant or resistant hypertension.
-
Resistant Hypertension in Older Adults
John M Giacona,Wanpen Vongpatanasin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2024.04.005
Abstract:Resistant hypertension is a complex disorder that requires a comprehensive evaluation of several patient characteristics. Attention should be paid to medication and lifestyle adherence, and investigation into potential secondary causes of resistant hypertension should occur as clinically indicated. Moreover, a shared, multidisciplinary decision-making approach with the patient, specialized care providers, and family members may enhance blood pressure control.
-
[Resistant hypertension and the risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in outpatients]
J H Xia,X Y Wang,Y Y Kang,J F Huang,Q H Guo,Y B Cheng,Y Li,J G Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20240415-00204
2024-08-24
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the prevalence and associated risk of cardiovascular event of resistant hypertension in treated outpatients. Methods: This study was a nationwide multi-center prospective cohort study. The participants were treated outpatients enrolled in the China Nationwide Ambulatory and Home Blood Pressure Registry study of 42 hospitals in 19 provinces across the country from August 2009 to October 2017. Apparent resistant hypertension was defined as uncontrolled office blood pressure (≥140/90 mmHg, 1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) in spite of the use of three antihypertensive drugs or controlled office blood pressure (<140/90 mmHg) with four antihypertensive drugs or more. Subjects diagnosed with uncontrolled office blood pressure were further subdivided as pseudo-resistant hypertension and true resistant hypertension based on 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. The primary endpoint was fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, which was a composite endpoint consisting of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular death, ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, myocardial infarction, coronary artery revascularization, unstable angina, heart failure, and coronary artery stenosis≥50% confirmed by coronary angiography. Secondary outcomes included fatal and non-fatal stroke or cardiac events. Patients with controlled office blood pressure after taking only 1 or 2 antihypertensive drugs were included as control. Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log-rank test, and Cox proportional risk model were used to evaluate the risk of apparent refractory hypertension in relation to cardiovascular and cerebrovascular prognosis. Results: A total of 2 782 treated hypertensive patients, aged (58.1±12.3) years were enrolled, including 1 403 (50.4%) men. The prevalence of apparent and true resistant hypertension was 15.1% (420/2 782) and 10.5% (293/2 782), respectively. Among patients with apparent resistant hypertension, during a median of 5 years follow-up, the cumulative incidence rate was 28.2, 11.2 and 19.1 per 1 000 person-years for fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events (n=58), stroke (n=24) and cardiac events (n=40), respectively. The Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test showed that those patients with true resistant hypertension, had the highest cumulative incidence rate of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events, stroke, and cardiac events. Multivariable Cox regression analyses showed that true resistant hypertension was associated with a significantly higher risk of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events (HR=1.73, 95%CI 1.17-2.56, P=0.006) and stroke (HR=2.81, 95%CI 1.53-5.17, P=0.001). Conclusion: Resistant hypertension, especially true resistant hypertension, is associated with a higher risk of fatal and non-fatal cardiac and cerebrovascular events.
-
Resistant and undertreated hypertension in patients with chronic kidney disease: data from the PATRIOTIC survey
Ying Zheng,Li Tang,Xiangmei Chen,Guangyan Cai,Wenge Li,Zhaohui Ni,Wei Shi,Xiaoqiang Ding,Hongli Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10641963.2018.1433193
Abstract:Background: Hypertension is prevalent in chronic kidney disease (CKD), but the control of hypertension is suboptimal. We reported the prevalence and characteristics of resistant and undertreated hypertension based on a nationwide survey aiming to improve blood pressure (BP) control. Methods: Resistant hypertension (RH) was defined as BP above the target (<140/90 mm Hg) despite the use of 3 antihypertensive drugs or achieving the target BP by using ≥4 antihypertensive drugs. Undertreated hypertension was defined as uncontrolled hypertension (unCH) using ≤2 drugs. We compared the characteristics and antihypertensive treatment among different groups (including RH and unCH using ≤2 drugs). Multivariable logistic regression was used to detect factors associated with unCH using ≤2 drugs and RH. Results: 4,435 nondialysis CKD patients with hypertension were analyzed, and 36.9% of participants achieved controlled hypertension (CH) using ≤3 drugs, 11.1% met the criteria for RH, and 52% had unCH despite the use of ≤ 2 antihypertensive drugs. Participants with unCH using ≤ 2 drugs had low usage of renin-angiotensin system blockers (36.8%) and diuretics (5.5%), which was much lower than participants with CH using ≤3 drugs and RH (P< 0.05). After multivariable adjustment, obesity, advanced CKD stages, urinary protein level of ≥1.5 g/24 h, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease were associated with RH in CKD patients (P< 0.05). Conclusion: Compared with RH, undertreated hypertension contributes more to the unCH in Chinese CKD patients. It is important to ensure adequate antihypertensive treatment, including choosing antihypertensive drugs, that guidelines recommended.
-
Hypertension, uncontrolled hypertension and resistant hypertension: prevalence, comorbidities and prescribed medications in 228,406 adults resident in urban areas. A population-based observational study
Simone Romano,Giulio Rigon,Martina Albrigi,Giacomo Tebaldi,Andrea Sartorio,Luca Cristin,Giulia Burrei,Cristiano Fava,Pietro Minuz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-023-03376-8
Abstract:Although hypertension is the leading cause of cardiovascular disease and premature death worldwide, it remains difficult to control. The prevalence of uncontrolled and resistant hypertension (RH) may be underestimated and can reach up to 50% of all hypertensive patients. The aim of this observational study was to analyze the prevalence of hypertension, uncontrolled hypertension and RH, and their associations with risk factors or diseases in a large cohort of patients referred to primary care physician. In a population of 228406 adults, we only collected data from people with a diagnosis of arterial hypertension for a total of 43,526 patients. For this purpose, we used the MySQL database, run by Azalea.NET, built on the medical records of 150 General Practitioners (GPs). Patient data included sex, age, blood pressure (BP) values, number of antihypertensive drugs and presence of major cardiovascular comorbidities. We classified patients with RH as those treated with 3 different antihypertensive agents, with recorded BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg, or patients taking ≥ 4 medications. The prevalence of hypertension was 19.06%, that of resistant hypertension was 2.46% of the whole population and 20.85% of the hypertensive group. Thirteen thousand hundred, forty-six patients (30.20% of the hypertensive group) had uncontrolled BP (≥ 140/90 mmHg), whereas 16,577 patients did not have BP measurements done in the last 2 years (38.09% of the hypertensive group). Patients with uncontrolled BP were mainly female, used less drugs and showed a lower prevalence of all major cardiovascular comorbidities, except for diabetes. Instead, patients with RH had a significantly higher prevalence of all considered comorbidities compared to those without RH. Our results evidence that a broad number of patients with hypertension, especially those without comorbidities or with a low number of antihypertensive drugs, do not achieve adequate BP control. To improve the clinical management of these patients it is very important to increase the collaboration between GPs and clinical specialists of hypertension.