Pricing strategy of e-retailers with discount selling period

li juan,pu yangxiaojuan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13587/j.cnki.jieem.2017.03.018

2017-01-01

Abstract:E-commerce has taken off quickly in recent years. In China, the Singles Day event is a popular shopping day which is promoted by Taobao and T-Mall, two major shopping platforms of the Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba. E-retailers offer a wide range of discounts and promotions in order to largely increase sales. In 2013, Taobao and T-Mall’s final online transactions on a single day reached 35.018 billion RMB(US $5.63 billion), which even exceeded those on Cyber Monday(US $2.29 billion). Consumers often compare price of different periods before purchasing. They add the goods they want to the shopping list in the normal shopping period and don’t pay until during the discount selling period. Although in the shopping rush consumers may have unpleasant experiences, which may be caused by poor pre-sale service and logistics service, the ultra-low discounts lead to frantic buying behaviors. Consumers are more willing to pay than usual because they are satisfied with their shopping processes and feel a sense of smartness and personal accomplishment for price comparison behaviors and discounts. In this paper, we consider a two-period model in which the e-retailer can use different pricing policies to deal with consumers’ price comparison behaviors: dynamic pricing policy or price commitment policy. A strategic consumer chooses between a purchase at the initial full price without out-stock risk and a later purchase at a discount price with out-stock risk, and then decides when to purchase. The e-retailer makes the pricing decisions. We derive the optimal prices of these two policies and show that the e-retailer can take advantage of consumers’ price comparison behaviors by setting appropriate initial full price and discount price. In the dynamic policy, whether the e-retailer can benefit from consumers’ price comparison behaviors depends on how pleasant consumers are with the discount. Specifically, when consumers are less pleasant with the discount, it is better for the e-retailer to induce consumers to purchase earlier, and then the e-retailer can’t benefit from consumers’ price comparison behaviors. However, when consumers are highly satisfied with the discount, the e-retailer should set higher initial full price to delay customer’s purchase. However, in the price commitment policy, the e-retailer can always benefit from consumers’ price comparison behaviors. Furthermore, comparing the e-retailer’s profit of the dynamic pricing policy and price commitment policy, we find that the e-retailer prefers price commitment policy rather than dynamic pricing policy. We also figure out the optimal price discount in the price commitment policy.