Gemcitabine/cisplatin versus methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cui Yu,Chen Hequn,Chen Jinbo,Zeng Feng,Zu Xiongbing,Ding Jian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1482.188434
2018-01-01
Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics
Abstract:Objective: The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the two most commonly used chemotherapy regimens gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) and methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin/adriamycin, and cisplatin (MVAC) regimens for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients. Methods: We searched for all studies investigating GC and MVAC for MIBC patients in PubMed, Web of Knowledge, and the Cochrane Central Search Library. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Results: Our searches identified 13 studies among 2174 patients. In the meta-analysis, the pathological complete response to GC regimens was superior to MVAC regimens. No significant difference in pathological partial response was found between the two groups. GC regimens were associated with a significant decrease risk in Grade 3-4 neutropenia, mucositis, and febrile neutropenia, but a significant increase risk in Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) when compared GC regimens to MVAC regimens. Conclusions: GC regimens significantly improved pathological complete response compared to MVAC regimens. GC regimens were associated with a significant decrease risk in Grade 3-4 neutropenia, mucositis, and febrile neutropenia, but a significant increase risk in Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia. There was no significant difference in OS, DSS, and DFS when compared the two regimens.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?