Promising clinical outcomes of sequential and "Sandwich" chemotherapy and extended involved-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with stage I E /II E extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma.

Han-Yu Wang,Shao-Qing Niu,Yun-Ying Yang,Yi-Yang Li,Hong-Bo Chen,Yu-Jing Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1755
IF: 4.711
2018-01-01
Cancer Medicine
Abstract:Background The optimal treatment for the rare subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL), nasal-type, has not been clearly defined. The purpose of the study was to investigate the efficacy of sequential and "Sandwich" chemotherapy and extended involved-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with stage I-E/IIE extranodal ENKTL, nasal-type. Methods One hundred and fifty-five patients with stage I-E/IIE nasal-type ENKTL were enrolled in the study, including 99 patients treated with sequential chemotherapy and extended involved-field IMRT (SCRT) and 56 patients with "Sandwich" chemotherapy and extended involved-field IMRT and chemotherapy (SCRCT). All patients were treated with extended involved-field IMRT with median dose of 54.6 Gy to the primary tumor and positive lymph nodes. Ninety-four patients had Ann Arbor stage I-E disease, and 61 patients had stage IIE disease. Results The 5-year rates of loco-regional recurrence (LRR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 17.0%, 78.5%, and 84.7%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that EBV DNA copy after treatment (normal vs elevated level) was significant prognostic factor for LRR, PFS, and OS (P 0.001); therapeutic method (SCRT vs SCRCT) was significant prognostic factor for PFS (71.0% vs 91.8%, P = 0.011), but there was no significant effect on 5-year LRR and OS (22.2% vs 8.2%, P = 0.051 for LRR; 80.9% vs 91.8%, P = 0.199 for OS). Conclusions Compared with SCRT, SCRCT was significantly associated with higher PFS rates and showed a trend toward improved loco-regional control. EBV DNA copy after treatment is a good index for recurrence and prognosis for stage I-E/IIE ENKTL patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?