Combined translational and rotational perturbations of standing balance reveal contributions of reduced reciprocal inhibition to balance impairments in children with cerebral palsy
Jente Willaert,Kaat Desloovere,Anja Van Campenhout,Lena H. Ting,Friedl De Groote
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012209
2024-06-15
PLoS Computational Biology
Abstract:Balance impairments are common in cerebral palsy. When balance is perturbed by backward support surface translations, children with cerebral palsy have increased co-activation of the plantar flexors and tibialis anterior muscle as compared to typically developing children. However, it is unclear whether increased muscle co-activation is a compensation strategy to improve balance control or is a consequence of reduced reciprocal inhibition. During translational perturbations, increased joint stiffness due to co-activation might aid balance control by resisting movement of the body with respect to the feet. In contrast, during rotational perturbations, increased joint stiffness will hinder balance control as it couples body to platform rotation. Therefore, we expect increased muscle co-activation in response to rotational perturbations if co-activation is caused by reduced reciprocal inhibition but not if it is merely a compensation strategy. We perturbed standing balance by combined backward translational and toe-up rotational perturbations in 20 children with CP and 20 TD children. Perturbations induced forward followed by backward movement of the center of mass. We evaluated reactive muscle activity and the relation between center of mass movement and reactive muscle activity using a linear feedback model based on center of mass kinematics. In typically developing children, perturbations induced plantar flexor balance correcting muscle activity followed by tibialis anterior balance correcting muscle activity, which was driven by center of mass movement. In children with cerebral palsy, the switch from plantar flexor to tibialis anterior activity was less pronounced than in typically developing children due to increased muscle co-activation of the plantar flexors and tibialis anterior throughout the response. Our results thus suggest that a reduction in reciprocal inhibition causes muscle co-activation in reactive standing balance in children with CP. Children with cerebral palsy often have balance impairments. When standing balance is perturbed using support-surface translations, children with cerebral palsy have high agonist-antagonist co-activation. Increasing joint stiffness by co-activating agonists and antagonists might aid standing balance control during translational, but not rotational perturbations. If children with cerebral palsy show muscle co-activation during rotational perturbations, we can assume that this co-activation is a consequence of neurological impairments (e.g., not be able to suppress antagonist activation upon stretch of the agonist). We found that both in typically developing children and children with cerebral palsy reactive muscle activity could be explained by delayed feedback of center of mass kinematics. Our combined translational and rotational perturbations induced a switch in center of mass movement (forward to backward). We found that upon this switch in center of mass movement, typically developing children switched from plantarflexor to tibialis anterior muscle activity. This switch in muscle activity was less clear in children with cerebral palsy, although center of mass movement was the same as in typically developing children, due to muscle co-activation. Therefore, our results suggest that neural impairments cause muscle co-activation in reactive standing balance in children with cerebral palsy.
biochemical research methods,mathematical & computational biology