Abstract:ObjectivesIn epidemiological studies, it is important to identify independent associations between collective exposures and a health outcome. The current stepwise selection technique ignores stochastic errors and suffers from a lack of stability. The alternative LASSO-penalized regression model can be applied to detect significant predictors from a pool of candidate variables. However, this technique is prone to false positives and tends to create excessive biases. It remains challenging to develop robust variable selection methods and enhance predictability.Material and methodsTwo improved algorithms denoted the two-stage hybrid and bootstrap ranking procedures, both using a LASSO-type penalty, were developed for epidemiological association analysis. The performance of the proposed procedures and other methods including conventional LASSO, Bolasso, stepwise and stability selection models were evaluated using intensive simulation. In addition, methods were compared by using an empirical analysis based on large-scale survey data of hepatitis B infection-relevant factors among Guangdong residents.ResultsThe proposed procedures produced comparable or less biased selection results when compared to conventional variable selection models. In total, the two newly proposed procedures were stable with respect to various scenarios of simulation, demonstrating a higher power and a lower false positive rate during variable selection than the compared methods. In empirical analysis, the proposed procedures yielding a sparse set of hepatitis B infection-relevant factors gave the best predictive performance and showed that the procedures were able to select a more stringent set of factors. The individual history of hepatitis B vaccination, family and individual history of hepatitis B infection were associated with hepatitis B infection in the studied residents according to the proposed procedures.Conclusions The newly proposed procedures improve the identification of significant variables and enable us to derive a new insight into epidemiological association analysis.

An Improved Variable Selection Procedure for Adaptive Lasso in High-Dimensional Survival Analysis.

Component-wise gradient boosting and false discovery control in survival analysis with high-dimensional covariates.

High-dimensional variable selection for Cox's proportional hazards model

Adaptive L1/2 shooting regularization method for survival analysis using gene expression data

Variable Selection for High-dimensional Cox Model with Error Rate Control

Unbiased Prediction and Feature Selection in High-Dimensional Survival Regression

Variable Selection Using the Lasso-Cox Model with Bayesian Regularization

Conditional screening for ultra-high dimensional covariates with survival outcomes

Variable selection via Group LASSO Approach : Application to the Cox Regression and frailty model

Efficient and Doubly-Robust Methods for Variable Selection and Parameter Estimation in Longitudinal Data Analysis

Adaptive lasso variable selection for the accelerated failure models

Variable selection with Group LASSO approach: Application to Cox regression with frailty model

Bayesian Variable Selection In Semiparametric Proportional Hazards Model For High Dimensional Survival Data

Bi-level variable selection via adaptive sparse group Lasso

Improved Variable Selection Algorithm Using A Lasso-Type Penalty, With An Application To Assessing Hepatitis B Infection Relevant Factors In Community Residents

Variable selection in the high-dimensional continuous generalized linear model with current status data

Variable selection for proportional hazards models with high‐dimensional covariates subject to measurement error

False discovery control for penalized variable selections with high-dimensional covariates.

Variable selection for nonlinear Cox regression model via deep learning

Survival Prediction and Variable Selection with Simultaneous Shrinkage and Grouping Priors