Abstract:Park et al1Park S.W. Lee K.J. Chung M.J. et al.Covered versus uncovered double bare self-expandable metal stent for palliation of unresectable extrahepatic malignant biliary obstruction: a randomized controlled multicenter trial.Gastrointest Endosc. 2023; 97: 132-142.e2Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (2) Google Scholar reported no significant differences in the 6-month stent patency rates and mortality between partially covered and uncovered double bare self-expandable metal stents (PCDBSs vs UCDBSs) for unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction. This randomized controlled multicenter trial is of great significance for clinical practice, yet we would like to share our reservations for further research. First, as shown in the baseline characteristics section, the length of the stricture was longer in PCDBSs than in UCDBSs (2.8 ± 1.3 vs 2.4 ± 1.2, P = .010). The length or the degree of stricture might be correlated with disease severity and stent patency,2Kim H.S. Lee D.K. Kim H.G. et al.Features of malignant biliary obstruction affecting the patency of metallic stents: a multicenter study.Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 55: 359-365Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (92) Google Scholar and longer biliary stricture was an independent risk factor for worse survival after metal stent insertion,3Zu Q.Q. Zhang J.X. Wang B. et al.Percutaneous transpapillary biliary stent placement for distal malignant biliary obstruction: outcomes and survival analysis.Turk J Gastroenterol. 2019; 30: 714-721Crossref Scopus (5) Google Scholar which is also in accord with the fact that the rate of tumor overgrowth was higher in the PCDBS group than in the UCDBS group (5.5% vs 0.8%). Therefore, we hypothesize that the PCDBS group had selection bias, which would weaken the effect of PCDBSs on stent patency and overall survival, and a propensity-matching analysis may be required. Second, we would like to know whether there was a significant difference in the total incidence of single adverse events between the 2 groups, regardless of the 2-week time limit, so as to better verify the overall impact of whether or not the novel metal stent is covered on the risk of adverse events.4Dumonceau J.M. Kapral C. Aabakken L. et al.ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline.Endoscopy. 2020; 52: 127-149Crossref PubMed Scopus (331) Google Scholar Third, the authors did not disclose the details of revision for stent dysfunction, which might have had some influence on stent patency and overall survival. For example, radiofrequency ablation can be performed by both endoscopic and percutaneous routes. As a novel adjunctive procedure and a promising therapeutic option in patients with malignant biliary obstruction, radiofrequency ablation can achieve local tumor control, resulting in improved biliary stent patency and a potential survival benefit.5Inoue T. Yoneda M. Updated evidence on the clinical impact of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction.Dig Endosc. 2022; 34: 345-358Crossref PubMed Scopus (22) Google Scholar Both authors disclosed no financial relationships.

Suspended over Length Biliary Stents Versus Conventional Plastic Biliary Stents for the Treatment of Biliary Stricture

Enteral Extended Biliary Stents Versus Conventional Plastic Biliary Stents for the Treatment of Extrahepatic Malignant Biliary Obstruction: a Single-Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Analysis of critical complications and their risk factors after biliary stent implantation for malignant biliary obstruction

Clinical Efficacy of Suspended Overlength Biliary Stents Reformed from Nasobiliary Tubes for Prevention of Duodenobiliary Reflux( with Video)

Clinical efficacy and safety of enteral extended biliary stent in treatment of biliary stricture

Safety and efficacy of side-by-side versus stent-in-stent stenting for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Efficacy and safety of covered versus uncovered self‑expandable metal stents for the palliative treatment of malignant distal biliary stricture: A long‑term retrospective study

Effect of Covered Self-Expanding Metal Stents Compared with Multiple Plastic Stents on Benign Biliary Stricture

Comparison of primary suture and biliary stent insertion with T-tube drainage after choledochotomy

Double Bare Self-Expandable Metal Stent for Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction.

Comparison of endoscopic bilateral metal stent drainage with plastic stents in the palliation of unresectable hilar biliary malignant strictures: Large multicenter study

Evaluating optimal bilateral biliary stenting in endoscopic reintervention after initial plastic stent dysfunction for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction: Retrospective cross‐sectional study

Percutaneous treatment of bilioenteric anastomotic strictures: Comparison of long-term outcomes between temporary covered stents and balloon dilation

[Long-term retrospective analysis of metallic stents in malignant biliary obstruction]

Randomized multicenter study of multiple plastic stents vs. covered self-expandable metallic stent in the treatment of biliary stricture in chronic pancreatitis

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Pathological Characteristics of Self-Expandable Stent Bridge to Surgery and Emergency Surgery in Obstructive Colon Cancer.

New anti-reflux plastic stent to reduce the risk of stent-related cholangitis in the treatment of biliary strictures

The performance of biliary stents in malignant biliary strictures

Comparison of an Inside Stent and a Fully Covered Self-Expandable Metallic Stent as Preoperative Biliary Drainage for Patients with Resectable Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Comparison of Covered Stent Vs Bare Metal Stent Implantation in Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Metal stent versus plastic stent in endoscopic ultrasound‐guided hepaticogastrostomy for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction: Large single‐center retrospective comparative study