Abstract:Although agricultural “best (or beneficial) management practices” (BMPs) first emerged to mitigate agro-environmental resource challenges, they may also enhance ‘non-provisioning’ ecosystem services. The enthusiasm for adopting BMPs partially depends on evidence that doing so will lead to agro-environmental benefits while not substantially reducing crop productivity or farmer income. We survey and synthesize evidence in the existing literature to document the joint effects on agricultural crop yield and 12 ecosystem service (ES) associated with implementation of 5 agricultural BMPs (crop rotations, cover crops, nutrient management, perennial vegetated buffers, reduced or no tillage). We also analyze the prevalence of co-benefits (‘win-win’), tradeoffs, and co-costs (‘lose-lose’) outcomes. On the basis of a set of contextual variables we then develop empirical models that predict the likelihood of co-benefits relative to tradeoffs, and co-costs. We found thirty-six studies investigating 141 combinations of crop yields and non-provisioning ES outcomes (YESs) in the relevant literatures covering the period 1983-2016. The scope of the review is global, but included studies are geographically concentrated in the U.S. Corn Belt (Midwestern United States). In the literature sample, reporting of co-benefits (26%) was much more prevalent than reporting of co-costs (4%) between yields and ES. Tradeoffs most often resulted in a reduction in crop yields and an increase in ES (28%); this was marginally greater than studies reporting a neutral influence on crop yields and an increase in ES (26%). Other Y/ES combinations were uncommon. Mixed-effects models indicated reduced tillage and crop rotations had generally positive associations with YESs. Temporal scale was an informative predictor suggesting studies with longer time scales resulted in greater positive outcomes on YESs, on average. Our results are a step towards identifying those contexts where co-benefits or partial improvement outcomes of BMPs are more likely to be realized, as well as the impact of particular practices on specific ES.

The Environmental Costs and Benefits of High-Yield Farming

Research data supporting" The environmental costs and benefits of high yield farming"

Ecological Pest Control Fortifies Agricultural Growth in Asia–Pacific Economies

Environmental Economics and Agricultural Policy

How to make land use policy decisions: Integrating science and economics to deliver connected climate, biodiversity, and food objectives.

Joint environmental and social benefits from diversified agriculture

Improving Human Diets and Welfare through Using Herbivore-Based Foods: 2. Environmental Consequences and Mitigations

Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices

Resolving Conflicts between Agriculture and the Natural Environment

“The good guys are doing it anyway”: The accommodation of environmental concern among English and Welsh farmers

An Overview of the Environmental Impact of Agriculture in the U.K.

Agricultural Beneficial Management Practices: A Synthesis of Co-benefits, Tradeoffs, and Co-costs between Crop Yield and Non-provisioning Ecosystem Services

Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of agricultural production systems, agricultural input efficiency, and food choice

The State of the World's Arable Land

The Global Cropland-Sparing Potential of High-Yield Farming

Publisher Correction: Cost-effective Mitigation of Nitrogen Pollution from Global Croplands

Agricultural Trade and Environmental Sustainability

Interactions Among Agricultural Production and Other Ecosystem Services Delivered from European Temperate Grassland Systems

Bringing Ecosystem Services into Economic Decision-Making: Land Use in the United Kingdom

Global agriculture and carbon trade-offs

Mitigation of gaseous emissions from dairy livestock: A farm-level method to examine the financial implications