Prognostic Value of Inflammation-Based Scores in Patients Receiving Radical Resection for Colorectal Cancer.

Fang Wang,Wenzhuo He,Chang Jiang,Guifang Guo,Bin Ke,Qiangsheng Dai,Jianting Long,Liangping Xia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4842-3
IF: 4.638
2018-01-01
BMC Cancer
Abstract:BACKGROUND:The modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are conventional inflammation-based scores for colorectal cancer (CRC). The systemic inflammation score (SIS) has been shown to be more informative than the mGPS in CRC. The albumin-NLR, composed of albumin and the NLR, can also be a candidate for a valuable inflammation score. However, about the utility of the mGPS, SIS, and albumin-NLR for CRC patients who have received radical resections remains unclear.METHODS:This study enrolled 877 CRC patients, who underwent radical surgical resection between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2014. The prognostic values of the mGPS, SIS, and albumin-NLR were compared by the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, multivariate Cox regression modelling, and the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (ROC).RESULTS:In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, all three inflammation scores were significantly associated with overall survival (OS) in the group including all the patients (mGPS, p = 0.016; SIS, p < 0.001; albumin-NLR, p = 0.007) and in the left-sided colon tumour subgroup (mGPS, p = 0.029; SIS p = 0.0013; albumin-NLR, p = 0.001). In the right-sided colon tumour subgroup, only the albumin-NLR was associated with OS (p = 0.048). The albumin-NLR was the only independent prognostic factor of the three scores for OS in the multivariate survival analysis.CONCLUSIONS:The albumin-NLR outperformed both the SIS and mGPS in predicting OS in CRC patients undergoing radical resection.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?