Abstract:Background There is a wide variety of observational methods for analyzing the biomechanical exposure of workers in the work environment. Valentim et al. (2023) performed a systematic review of these methods and identified 10 explicit observational methods of analyzing biomechanical exposure with high quality of evidence and good measurement properties. The lack of studies that analyze the criteria, the specificity and the way in which these methods evaluate the exposure factors, and their dimensions (frequency, intensity, and magnitude) stimulated this study. Objectives To present the characteristics and criteria of the 10 most observational methods with adequate reproducibility and validity measurement properties, and with acceptable quality of evidence. Methods This is an analytical and descriptive study of the 10 observational methods for analyzing the biomechanical exposure of workers identified in the systematic review by Valentim et al. (2023), being the most researched and with adequate properties for measuring reproducibility, validity, and acceptable quality. of evidence. Three professionals with knowledge and experience in using the methods carried out a weighted assessment, seeking to identify the main characteristics of each method (occupational task evaluated and main posture of analysis), in addition to data on risk factors, their dimensions and body segments of each method. Finally, the influence of each criterion on the risk exposure classification was evaluated, based on the partial and final scores. Results Among the evaluated methods, seven of them present characteristics and criteria that allow a general evaluation of the worker in any main posture. The most evaluated risk factors were joint position and range of motion. The EAWS method is the method that most evaluates biomechanical exposure factors (nine out of the ten listed). The ACGIH HAL TLV and RULA do not assess all biomechanical exposure factors. ROSA is the method that evaluates a greater number of body segments. The trunk and isolated segments, such as the shoulder and wrist, are present in the evaluation of seven of the ten methods. The EAWS, PATH, REBA, ROSA, and RULA methods assess the lower limbs in general. Most of the criteria (exposure factors and body segments) evaluated by the 10 observational methods have a great influence on the classification of risk exposure. Conclusion The EWAS, OWAS, PATH, QEC, REBA, RULA and SI methods evaluate any task in general. The ACGIH HAL TLV and ROSA methods are directed to specific tasks. The assessment of biomechanical factors and body parts vary between each method and the most complete and detailed observational method among all analyzed in this study is the European Assembly Worksheet (EAWS). Implications Getting to know the methods better is essential and will help both in choosing the most appropriate method for the analysis and in choosing more assertive preventive measures in the work environment. Contributing to the decision-making of professionals and favoring the reduction of work-related musculoskeletal disorders.

Use of various obesity measurement and classification methods in occupational safety and health research: a systematic review of the literature

Statistical methods for body mass index: A selective review

Statistical methods for body mass index: a selective review of the literature

Diagnostic performance of body mass index to identify obesity as defined by body adiposity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Anthropometric Parameters and Their Associations with Cardio-Metabolic Risk in Chinese Working Population

A systematic literature review on obesity: Understanding the causes & consequences of obesity and reviewing various machine learning approaches used to predict obesity

Effectiveness of Policies and Programs to Combat Adult Obesity: a Systematic Review

Observational methods for the analysis of biomechanical exposure in the workplace: a systematic review

Validation of Obesity Status Based on Self-Reported Data among Filipina and Indonesian Female Migrant Domestic Workers in Macao (SAR), China.

Adult obesity diagnostic tool: A narrative review

Body mass index, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and body fat in relation to health care use in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging

Relevance of Anthropometric Measurements in a Multiethnic Obesity Cohort: Observational Study

Identification of the Most Appropriate Existing Anthropometric Index for Home-Based Obesity Screening in Children and Adolescents.

Sedentary behaviors and physical activity of the working population measured by accelerometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis

A meta-analysis of observational studies including dose–response relationship between long working hours and risk of obesity

Trends over 5 Decades in U.S. Occupation-Related Physical Activity and Their Associations with Obesity

Sedentary work, low physical job demand, and obesity in US workers.

BMI in Evaluating Obesity of Contemporary College Students

Is Shift Work Associated With A Higher Risk Of Overweight Or Obesity? A Systematic Review Of Observational Studies With Meta-Analysis

Anthropometric Indicators as a Tool for Diagnosis of Obesity and Other Health Risk Factors: A Literature Review

WHAT IS THE MOST COMPLETE OBSERVATIONAL METHOD OF ANALYSIS OF BIOMECHANICAL EXPOSURE IN THE CRITERIA USED?