Abstract:Urbanization is considered a main indicator of regional economic development due to its positive effect on promoting industrial development; however, many regions, especially developing countries, have troubled in its negative effect—the aggravating environmental pollution. Many researchers have addressed that the rapid urbanization stimulated the expansion of the industrial production and increased the industrial pollutant emissions. However, this statement is exposed to a grave drawback in that urbanization not only expands industrial production but also improves labor productivity and changes industrial structure. To make up this drawback, we first decompose the influence of urbanization impacts on the industrial pollutant emissions into the scale effect, the intensive effect, and the structure effect by using the Kaya Identity and the LMDI Method; second, we perform an empirical study of the three effects by applying the spatial panel model on the basis of the data from 282 prefecture-level cities of China from 2003 to 2014. Our results indicate that (1) there are significant reverse U-shapes between China’s urbanization rate and the volume of industrial wastewater discharge, sulfur dioxide emissions and soot (dust) emissions; (2) the relationship between China’s urbanization and the industrial pollutant emissions depends on the scale effect, the intensive effect and the structure effect jointly. Specifically, the scale effect and the structure effect tend to aggravate the industrial wastewater discharge, the sulfur dioxide emissions and the soot (dust) emissions in China’s cities, while the intensive effect results in decreasing the three types of industrial pollutant emissions; (3) there are significant spatial autocorrelations of the industrial pollutant emissions among China’s cities, but the spatial spillover effect is non-existent or non-significant. We attempt to explain this contradiction due to the fact that the vast rural areas around China’s cities serve as sponge belts and absorb the spatial spillover of the industrial pollutant emissions from cities. According to the results, we argue the decomposition of the three effects is necessary and meaningful, it establishes a cornerstone in understanding the definite relationship between urbanization and industrial pollutant emissions, and effectively contributes to the relative policy making.

The Aggravation of Urban Air Quality Deterioration Due to Urbanization, Transportation and Economic Development - Panel Models with Marginal Effect Analyses Across China

An Econometric Approach Toward Identifying the Relationship Between Vehicular Traffic and Air Quality in Beijing

The Impact of Urban Transportation Infrastructure on Air Quality

Effects of Air Pollution Control on Urban Development Quality in Chinese Cities Based on Spatial Durbin Model

Urban public transport and air quality: Empirical study of China cities

Quantifying the Impacts of Economic Progress, Economic Structure, Urbanization Process, and Number of Vehicles on PM2.5 Concentration: A Provincial Panel Data Model Analysis of China

Urban Traffic Infrastructure Investment and Air Pollution: Evidence from the 83 Cities in China

Urbanization and Its Effects on Industrial Pollutant Emissions: an Empirical Study of a Chinese Case with the Spatial Panel Model

Identifying the Spatial Effects and Driving Factors of Urban PM2.5 Pollution in China

Impact of urban agglomeration construction on urban air quality–empirical test based on PSM–DID model

Analysis of spatio-temporal distribution characteristics and socioeconomic drivers of urban air quality in China

The Influential Factors of Urban PM2.5 Concentrations in China: a Spatial Econometric Analysis

The ambient air quality standards, green innovation, and urban air quality: evidence from China

Can public transportation development improve urban air quality? Evidence from China

Spatio-Temporal Differences and Driving Forces of Air Quality in Chinese Cities

Regional variation of urban air quality in China and its dominant factors

Strategizing the Relation Between Urbanization and Air Pollution: Empirical Evidence from Global Countries

Exploring spatiotemporal distribution characteristics of air quality and driving factors: empirical evidence of 288 cities in China

The Impact of the Dynamics of Agglomeration Externalities on Air Pollution: Evidence from Urban Panel Data in China

Spatiotemporal Regularity and Socioeconomic Drivers of the AQI in the Yangtze River Delta of China

How does new-type urbanization affect air pollution? Empirical evidence based on spatial spillover effect and spatial Durbin model