Abstract:BACKGROUND:Randomized controlled trials are considered the gold standard for evaluating experimental treatments but often require large sample sizes. Single-arm trials require smaller sample sizes but are subject to bias when using historical control data for comparative inferences. This article presents a Bayesian adaptive synthetic-control design that exploits historical control data to create a hybrid of a single-arm trial and a randomized controlled trial.METHODS:The Bayesian adaptive synthetic control design has two stages. In stage 1, a prespecified number of patients are enrolled in a single arm given the experimental treatment. Based on the stage 1 data, applying propensity score matching and Bayesian posterior prediction methods, the usefulness of the historical control data for identifying a pseudo sample of matched synthetic-control patients for making comparative inferences is evaluated. If a sufficient number of synthetic controls can be identified, the single-arm trial is continued. If not, the trial is switched to a randomized controlled trial. The performance of The Bayesian adaptive synthetic control design is evaluated by computer simulation.RESULTS:The Bayesian adaptive synthetic control design achieves power and unbiasedness similar to a randomized controlled trial but on average requires a much smaller sample size, provided that the historical control data patients are sufficiently comparable to the trial patients so that a good number of matched controls can be identified in the historical control data. Compared to a single-arm trial, The Bayesian adaptive synthetic control design yields much higher power and much smaller bias.CONCLUSION:The Bayesian adaptive synthetic-control design provides a useful tool for exploiting historical control data to improve the efficiency of single-arm phase II clinical trials, while addressing the problem of bias when comparing trial results to historical control data. The proposed design achieves power similar to a randomized controlled trial but may require a substantially smaller sample size.

Bayesian Design of Non-inferiority Clinical Trials Via the Bayes Factor

Bayesian Approach for Design and Analysis of Medical Device Trials in the Era of Modern Clinical Studies

BASIC: A Bayesian Adaptive Synthetic-Control Design for Phase II Clinical Trials.

A Calibrated Power Prior Approach to Borrow Information from Historical Data with Application to Biosimilar Clinical Trials.

Bayesian Optimal Phase II Design for Randomized Clinical Trials

Bayesian Optimal Phase II Designs with Dual‐criterion Decision Making

A Bayesian Design for Phase II Clinical Trials with Delayed Responses Based on Multiple Imputation.

A Bayesian Group Sequential Design for Randomized Biosimilar Clinical Trials with Adaptive Information Borrowing from Historical Data

A Bayesian Phase II Proof-of-concept Design for Clinical Trials with Longitudinal Endpoints.

BOP2: Bayesian Optimal Design for Phase II Clinical Trials with Simple and Complex Endpoints.

Bayesian Optimal Interval Designs for Phase I Clinical Trials

A Bayesian Dose Finding Design for Oncology Clinical Trials of Combinational Biological Agents

A Bayesian Dose-Finding Design for Phase I/II Clinical Trials with Nonignorable Dropouts.

Bayesian Optimal Interval Design: A Simple and Well-Performing Design for Phase I Oncology Trials.

A Bayesian Piecewise Exponential Phase II Design for Monitoring a Time‐to‐event Endpoint

Bayesian hybrid dose-finding design in phase I oncology clinical trials.

On the Relative Efficiency of Model-Assisted Designs: a Conditional Approach.

Optimizing Interim Analysis Timing for Bayesian Adaptive Commensurate Designs

BOIN Suite: A Software Platform to Design and Implement Novel Early-Phase Clinical Trials

Lessons Learned from Implementing a Novel Bayesian Adaptive Dose-Finding Design in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

Bayesian design of clinical trials using the scale transformed power prior