Does Liver Cirrhosis Have an Impact on the Results of Different Hepatic Inflow Occlusion Methods in Laparoscopic Liver Resection? a Propensity Score Analysis

Xiang Lan,Hongyu Li,Fei Liu,Bo Li,Yonggang Wei,Hua Zhang,Hongwei Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2018.09.009

IF: 3.842

2019-01-01

HPB

Abstract:Background: Few studies have analyzed the impact of liver cirrhosis on different hepatic inflow occlusion methods in laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). Intermittent Pringle (IP) was compared to continuous hemihepatic vascular inflow occlusion (CHVIO) in LLR in patients with or without cirrhosis. Methods: Patients who underwent LLR at the West China Hospital of Sichuan University form January 2015 to October 2017 were grouped according to occlusion methods and severity of cirrhosis. A matched propensity score analysis was performed. Results: Among patients without cirrhosis, there were no significant differences in blood loss (238 +/- 30 ml VS 265 +/- 46 ml, P = 0.653), operative time (228 +/- 9 min VS 265 +/- 20 min, P = 0.437) or other postoperative results between the IP and CHVIO groups after propensity score matching. Among patients with cirrhosis, blood loss (279 +/- 24 ml VS 396 +/- 35 ml, P = 0.012) and operative time (237 +/- 11 min VS 285 +/- 24 min, P = 0.041) were significantly lower in the IP group, while postoperative liver function did not significantly differ between the two groups after propensity score matching. Conclusions: In patients without cirrhosis, IP is as efficient and as safe as CHVIO in cirrhotic patients. IP offers the advantages of shorter operative time and less blood loss and does not result in worse postoperative liver function.