Abstract:Signal amplification in biomolecular networks converts a linear input to a steeply sigmoid output and is central to a number of cellular functions including proliferation, differentiation, homeostasis, adaptation, and biological rhythms. One canonical signal amplifying motif is zero-order ultrasensitivity that is mediated through the posttranslational modification (PTM) cycle of signaling proteins. The functionality of this signaling motif has been examined conventionally by supposing that the total amount of the protein substrates remains constant, as by the classical Koshland–Goldbeter model. However, covalent modification of signaling proteins often results in changes in their stability, which affects the abundance of the protein substrates. Here, we use mathematical models to explore the signal amplification properties in such scenarios and report some novel aspects. Our analyses indicate that PTM-induced protein stabilization brings the enzymes closer to saturation. As a result, ultrasensitivity may emerge or is greatly enhanced, with a steeper sigmoidal response, higher magnitude, and generally longer response time. In cases where PTM destabilizes the protein, ultrasensitivity can be regained through changes in the activities of the involved enzymes or from increased protein synthesis. Importantly, ultrasensitivity is not limited to modified or unmodified protein substrates—when protein turnover is considered, the total free protein substrate can also exhibit ultrasensitivity under several conditions. When full enzymatic reactions are used instead of Michaelis–Menten kinetics for the modeling, the total free protein substrate can even exhibit nonmonotonic dose–response patterns. It is conceivable that cells use inducible protein stabilization as a strategy in the signaling network to boost signal amplification while saving energy by keeping the protein substrate levels low at basal conditions.

Self-Amplifying Pulsatile Protein Dynamics without Positive Feedback.

Pulsatile Dynamics in the Yeast Proteome

A simple negative interaction in the positive transcriptional feedback of a single gene is sufficient to produce reliable oscillations

Functional Roles Of Pulsing In Genetic Circuits

Oscillation patterns in negative feedback loops

The role of feedback control mechanisms on the establishment of oscillatory regimes in the Ras/cAMP/PKA pathway in S. cerevisiae

Noise-induced Dynamics in the Mixed-Feedback-loop Network Motif.

Stochastic focusing coupled with negative feedback enables robust regulation in biochemical reaction networks

Messenger RNA Fluctuations and Regulatory RNAs Shape the Dynamics of Negative Feedback Loop

Single-cell stochastic gene expression kinetics with coupled positive-plus-negative feedback

Report in the Yeast Proteome

Efficient analysis of stochastic gene dynamics in the non-adiabatic regime using piecewise deterministic Markov processes

Oscillations and temporal signalling in cells

A positive feedback at the cellular level promotes robustness and modulation at the circuit level

Cell-cycle-synchronized, oscillatory expression of a negatively autoregulated gene in E. coli

Combinatorial Gene Regulation by Modulation of Relative Pulse Timing.

Biological rhythms generated by a single activator-repressor loop with heterogeneity and diffusion

Emergence and Enhancement of Ultrasensitivity through Posttranslational Modulation of Protein Stability

Excitable solitons: Annihilation, crossover, and nucleation of pulses in mass-conserving activator-inhibitor media

Robust, Tunable Biological Oscillations from Interlinked Positive and Negative Feedback Loops

Biochemical Oscillations in Delayed Negative Cyclic Feedback: Harmonic Balance Analysis with Applications