Entities of Chronic and Granulomatous Invasive Fungal Rhinosinusitis: Separate or Not?

Ling-Hong Zhou,Xuan Wang,Rui-Ying Wang,Hua-Zhen Zhao,Ying-Kui Jiang,Jia-Hui Cheng,Li-Ping Huang,Zhong-Qing Chen,De-Hui Wang,Li-Ping Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy228
2018-01-01
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Abstract:BACKGROUND:Chronic and granulomatous invasive fungal rhinosinusitis are important causes of blindness and craniocerebral complications. However, the classification of these 2 diseases remains controversial.METHODS:We retrospectively analyzed patients with chronic and granulomatous invasive fungal rhinosinusitus in a Chinese tertiary hospital from 2009 to 2017, with a focus on classification and comparisons.RESULTS:Among 55 patients enrolled in our study, 11 (11/55, 20%) had granulomatous invasive fungal rhinosinusitis (GIFRS) and 44 (44/55, 80%) had chronic invasive fungal rhinosinusitis (CIFRS). Aspergillus fumigatus and Dematiaceous hyphomycetes were identified in 2 patients with GIFRS. Compared with granulomatous type, CIFRS was more frequently encountered in immunocompromised patients (P = .022), and the time from onset to diagnosis was much shorter (P = .001). Proptosis and orbital apex syndrome showed no significant difference between granulomatous and CIFRS in our study. The treatment options and prognosis of both diseases also showed no significant difference.CONCLUSIONS:Despite the consensus on histopathology, the classification of the chronic and granulomatous types may need further evaluation in clinical considerations.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?