Abstract:Background Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) refers to a situation where the indexed effective orifice area (iEOA) of an implanted prosthetic valve is too small relative to the patient's body size, resulting in hemodynamic compromise. Studies examining the long-term consequences of PPM after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) have yielded conflicting results. Purpose To evaluate the impact of PPM on long-term outcomes in patients undergoing primary isolated SAVR. Methods All patients who underwent isolated first-time SAVR from 1990-2014 were included in this observational, single-center study. PPM was defined as a predicted iEOA <0.85 cm2/m2 and severe PPM was defined as an iEOA <0.65 cm2/m2. Patient demographics, surgical details, and in-hospital outcomes were prospectively collected in our institutional database. Cases were linked to provincial administrative databases at an independent, non-profit research institute whose legal status allows it to collect and analyze health care and demographic data. The primary outcome of interest was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were aortic valve reoperation (surgical or transcatheter) and post-operative hospitalization for heart failure. Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified risk factors for long-term mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for long-term survival and cumulative incidence functions for aortic valve reoperation and heart failure hospitalization. Results A total of 1,798 patients were included (no PPM: 770 [43%]; moderate PPM: 943 [52%]; and severe PPM: 85 [5%]). Mean age was 64±13 years, and 750 (42%) were female. 451 (25%) patients received a mechanical valve, and 1347 (75%) received a stented bioprosthetic valve. Concomitant aortic root enlargement was performed in 492 (27%) patients. At 20 years, survival was 47.8% (95% CI: 43.2%–52.2%) in the "no PPM group" compared with 29.5% (95% CI: 25.6%–33.5%) and 24.7% (95% CI: 12.7%–38.8%) in the moderate and severe PPM groups, respectively (p<0.001) (Figure 1). On multivariable analysis, iEOA was independently associated with long-term mortality (HR 0.95 per 0.10 increase in iEOA, 95% CI [0.91–0.98]; p=0.007). In a pre-specified subgroup analysis, iEOA was found to be associated with late mortality in patients younger than 65 years (p<0.001) but not in patients 65 years and older (p=0.23). Readmission for heart failure was more frequent among patients who had PPM than those who did not (Figure 2). There was no difference in aortic valve reintervention in patients with or without PPM (p=0.654). Conclusions Prosthesis-patient mismatch is common after SAVR and is associated with late mortality and hospitalization for heart failure. The deleterious impact of PPM on survival appears more pronounced in young patients. These findings may have important implications for the lifetime management of patients with aortic valve disease.Survival post SAVRHeart failure hospitalization post SAVR

Prosthesis-patient Mismatch after Mitral Valve Replacement: a Single-Centered Retrospective Analysis in East China

Contemporary Trends in Mitral Valve Surgery in East China: a 10-Year Experience

Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement: a retrospective analysis in East China

Determinants of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch after Aortic Valve Replacement-Ten-Year Cohort Data in Single Center of Taiwan

Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data of 122 989 Patients With 592 952 Patient-Years

Prosthesis-patient mismatch is associated with long-term mortality following surgical aortic valve replacement

Impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch on long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement

Effect of patient prosthesis mismatch on clinical outcomes following surgical aortic valve replacement

Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Analysis of the PARTNER Trials

Incidence and Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients Who Underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Observation of a Chinese Population.

[Comparison of mid-to-long term outcomes between mitral valve repair and biological valve replacement in patients over 60 with rheumatic mitral valve disease based on a propensity score matching study]

The impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Type and Size of Implanted Bioprosthetic Valve Rather Than Intraoperative Peak Transprosthetic Valvular Velocity Predict Postoperative Midterm Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in Patients Undergoing Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

Long-term outcomes of isolated mechanical versus bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in different age groups of propensity-matched patients

Patient and procedure selection for the prevention of prosthesis-patient mismatch following aortic valve replacement

Anatomical Analysis and Prognostic Assessment of Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation Based on a Large Echocardiography Database: Implications for Transcatheter Edge-to-edge and Chordal Repair

Long-Term Outcomes of Bioprosthetic and Mechanical Valve Replacement for Patients Aged between 50 and 70 Years

Aortic valve prosthesis–patient mismatch and exercise capacity in adult patients with congenital heart disease

Sex Differences in the Outcomes of Degenerative Mitral Valve Repair

Early and Mid-Term Outcomes of Isolate Mitral Valve Repair Through Minimal Invasive Versus Median Sternotomy Ap-Proach: a Propensity-Matched Analysis

Mitral valve replacement via minimally invasive totally thoracoscopic surgery versus traditional median sternotomy: a propensity score matched comparative study