Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To compare the incidence of technical complications of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in Chinese patients with a history of moderate or severe periodontitis and periodontally healthy patients(PHP) and analyze the effects of interproximal papillae patterns on food impaction and efficacy of plaque control. METHODS:A total of 103 partially edentulous patients treated with implant-supported fixed dental prostheses between December 2009 and December 2012 for a minimum 1-year follow-up period were recruited from Department of Periodontology, Peking University, School and Hospital of Stomatology. Based on the initial periodontal examination, the participants were divided into three groups: 30 PHP, 36 moderate periodontally compromised patients(mPCP) and 37 severe periodontally compromised patients(sPCP). Implant survival/loss, technical complications, plaque index, papilla index, food impaction and degree of proximal contact tightness of each patient were assessed around the implants at follow-up. According to the implant papilla index, the implants were divided into two groups: the "filling" group with the mesial and distal aspects with papilla index=3 and the "no filling" group with at least one aspect with papilla index<3. Data on implant survival, technical complications were analyzed. Comparisons of the incidence of technical complications were performed between the patients with different periodontal conditions with chi-square or Fisher's exact test. The influences of the interproximal papillae loss on food impaction and efficacy of plaque control were estimated with chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS:The total implant survival rate was 100%(162/162) for all three groups. Technical complications were as following: veneer fractures(1.9%, 3/162), abutment screw loosening(1.9%, 3/162), prosthetic screw loosening(3.1%, 5/162) and decementation(3.1%, 5/162) in all subjects. No implant/screw fracture was noted. The incidence of technical complications in sPCP, mPCP and PHP did not yield statistically significant differences(P>0.05). The proportion of the implant with the mesial and distal papilla index=3 in the sPCP was less than that in the PHP and mPCP. The interproximal papillae loss did not appear to affect the food impaction and the plaque index in all three groups(P>0.05). However, for the PHP, the accumulation of plaque at buccal aspect was more in the "no filling" group compared with the "filling" group (implant plaque index[M(Q)]: 1[1] vs 0[0]), and for the sPCP, the accumulation of plaque at lingual aspect was more in the "filling" group compared with the "no filling" group(implant plaque index[M(Q)]: 1[1] vs 0[1], (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS:The patients with a history of severe periodontitis did not exhibit more technical problems compared with the periodontally healthy patients. The interproximal papillae loss did not show a negative impact on the plaque control and food impaction. However, for the sPCP, changing the morphology and the position of the interproximal contact point to reduce the interdental black triangle may lead to accumulation of plaque at lingual aspect. More attention should be placed on the morphology design of prosthesis, but not the papillae filling up the interproximal space.

A Retrospective Cohort Study of Peri‐implant Condition in Chinese Patients with Different Periodontal Condition and Maintenance Frequency

The Occurrence of Peri-Implant Mucositis Associated with the Shift of Submucosal Microbiome in Patients with a History of Periodontitis During the First Two Years.

Peri-implant conditions and their relationship with periodontal conditions in Chinese patients: a cross-sectional study.

Application of Information-Motivation-Behavioral model–based Continuity of Care on the Peri-implantitis recovery in Diabetic Implant Overdenture Patients: A Randomised Controlled Trial

The Characteristics of Microbiome and Cytokines in Healthy Implants and Peri-Implantitis of the Same Individuals

Investigation of Peri-Implant Diseases Prevalence and Related Risk Indicators in Patients with Treated Severe Periodontitis over 4 Years after Restoration

Association of Preventive Maintenance Therapy Compliance and Peri-Implant Diseases: A Cross-Sectional Study

Evaluation of Clinical Parameters in Implant Maintenance Phase for Prevention of Peri-implantitis

Study on Prevalence and Risk Indicators for Peri-implant Disease

Implant mobility,SBI and PIS changes in patients with chronic periodontitis after implant treatment

Analysis of 3-year survival of implants in patients with chronic periodontitis

Peri-Implant Conditions And Marginal Bone Loss Around Cemented And Screw-Retained Single Implant Crowns In Posterior Regions: A Retrospective Cohort Study With Up To 4 Years Follow-Up

[Technical Complications Rates and Plaque Control of Fixed Dental Prostheses in Patients Treated for Periodontal Disease].

Microbial profiles of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: Submucosal microbial dysbiosis correlates with disease severity

[Interaction between implants and natural teeth in patients with severe periodontitis:a retrospective study]

Peri-implant phenotype, calprotectin and MMP-8 levels in cases diagnosed with peri-implant disease

Clinical outcomes and supragingival microbiota analysis around dental implants and teeth in patients with a history of periodontitis: a preliminary study of 6 months follow-up

Clinical outcomes of dental implants in patients with and without history of periodontitis: A 20-year prospective study

Evaluation of peri-implant condition in periodontally compromised patients

[A Prospective Cohort Study on the Effect of Implant Restoration Following Micro Crestal Flap-Alveolar Ridge Preservation at Molar Extraction Sockets with Severe Periodontitis].

A Clinical Study on the Effectiveness of Implant Supported Dental Restoration in Patients with Chronic Periodontal Diseases