Cyclodialysis cleft repair and cataract management by phacoemulsification combined with internal tamponade using modified capsular tension ring insertion

Jiahui Chen,Qinghe Jing,Wei Gao,Min Zhang,Yinghong Ji,Junyi Chen,Yongxiang Jiang,Yi Lu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-018-4149-8
2018-01-01
Abstract:Purpose To evaluate the surgical outcomes of cyclodialysis cleft repair and cataract management by phacoemulsification combined with internal tamponade using a modified capsular tension ring (MCTR) compared with direct cyclopexy. Methods The preoperative and postoperative characteristics of patients with cyclodialysis clefts who underwent surgery via insertion of an MCTR into the ciliary sulcus (MCTR group; 16 patients, 16 eyes) or direct cyclopexy (DC group; 16 patients, 16 eyes) were recorded. Results The cyclodialysis extended over 2.6 ± 1.9 clock hours in the MCTR group and 3.5 ± 1.8 clock hours in the DC group ( P = 0.094). Postoperatively, the IOP was not significantly different between the MCTR and DC groups (12.9 ± 3.7 mmHg vs. 13.8 ± 6.2 mmHg, P = 0.985); the logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution BCVA was better (0.1 ± 0.2 vs. 1.0 ± 0.9, P < 0.001), and the anterior chamber depth was greater (3.87 ± 0.40 mm vs. 2.59 ± 0.58 mm, P < 0.001) in the MCTR group than in the DC group. Compared with the preoperative parameters, the postoperative BCVA, IOP, and anterior chamber depth values were significantly improved in the MCTR group ( P < 0.05), whereas the BCVA showed no significant improvement postoperatively in the DC group ( P = 0.174). Logistic regression revealed no significant risk factors for successful IOP control or BCVA improvement. Conclusion Phacoemulsification combined with internal tamponade using MCTR insertion into the ciliary sulcus is a safe and minimally invasive method for effectively closing cyclodialysis clefts and managing cataract.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?