Abstract:We read with great interest the article by Onuma et al. [1] which evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of ABSORB bioasorbable everolimus-eluting stent (BVS) scaffold. The investigators of the study have made pioneering contributions to the assessment of bioresorbable scaffolds. It was concluded that sustained safety could be achieved after the implantation of a fully bioresorbable Absorb everolimus-eluting scalffold with a low event rate at 5 years. Besides, the ABSORB Cohort A trial confirmed the feasibility of noninvasive anatomic and functional assessment of the scaffold with the use of multislice computed tomography (MSCT) angiography and MSCT-based fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment. However, we have several concerns with regard to the study. First, we have to notice that noninvasive FFR analysis was feasible only in 13 patients. The limited size has weakened the reliability of noninvasive FFR performance in assessing functional outcome of ABSORB BVS. Good image quality of all coronary arteries and accurate lumen boundary descriptions are essential for the noninvasive FFR interpretation [2]. Although published reports suggested that CT derived FFR (FFRCT) accuracy was less affected by MSCT image quality than CT stenosis [3], there were four patients (22.2%) who cannot have FFRCT analysis due to severe artifact. Besides, in those with feasible FFRCT, numerous artifacts including calcification, motion, and misregistration may also affect MSCT performance and lead to inaccurate anatomic models for FFRCT computation [4]. Thus, the feasibility and precision of FFRCT need to be further improved. It is not appropriate to use FFRCT alone as a hemodynamic parameter in functional coronary stenosis measurement. Second, a fly in the ointment of the study was the absence of invasive FFR as a reference against noninvasive FFRCT at 5 years. Despite Onuma et al. demonstrated several reasons that they decided to perform repeat MSCT alone instead of invasive imaging, we cannot deny the fact that no published convincing trial exists for FFRCT in the evaluation of interventional treatment [4], although the DISCOVER-FLOW study [5] validated that the FFRCT had a good correlation with an invasive FFR, and the DeFACTO trial [6] demonstrated that the FFRCT plus CT was superior to CT alone as a measure of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) stenosis severity for determination of lesion-specific ischemia. Finally, in the study, angiographic reference standard of the vessel lumen area was derived from MSCT analysis instead of invasive coronary angiography [1]. It is important, however, to note that there is an overestimation of stenosis severity identified by CCTA and even among severe stenosis confirmed by invasive coronary angiography, only a minority cause ischemia [4,6]. Therefore, the possible deviation resulted from the inaccurate reference of MSCT may make the results less convincible.

Automatic Analysis of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds in Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Images.

Automatic Quantitative Analysis of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Struts in Optical Coherence Tomography Images Using Region Growing

Automatic Detection Approach for Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Using a U-Shaped Convolutional Neural Network.

Automatic stent strut detection in intravascular ultrasound using feature extraction and classification technique.

Automatic Stent Reconstruction in Optical Coherence Tomography Based on a Deep Convolutional Model.

Bioresorbable scaffold visualization in IVOCT images using CNNs and weakly supervised localization

Patient-Specific 3D Volumetric Reconstruction of Bioresorbable Stents: A Method to Generate 3D Geometries for Computational Analysis of Coronaries Treated with Bioresorbable Stents

Wavelet-based U-shape network for bioabsorbable vascular stents segmentation in IVOCT images

Stent detection with very thick tissue coverage in intravascular OCT

Automatic Side Branch Ostium Detection and Main Vascular Segmentation in Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Images

In Vivo Reconstruction Of Coronary Artery And Bioresorbable Stents From Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography

Assessment of Effectiveness of the Algorithm for Automated Quantitative Analysis of Metallic Strut Tissue Short-Term Coverage with Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography

Challenges in Multislice Computed Tomography Based Fractional Flow Reserve to Evaluate Interventional Treatment

A New 3-D Automated Computational Method to Evaluate In-Stent Neointimal Hyperplasia in In-Vivo Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Pullbacks

Automatic vasculature identification in coronary angiograms by adaptive geometrical tracking

Automatic Segmentation of Bioabsorbable Vascular Stents in Intravascular Optical Coherence Images Using Weakly Supervised Attention Network.

Automatic stent struts detection in optical coherence tomography based on a multiple attention convolutional model

Visibility of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold in Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging

Automatic Side Branch Detection in Optical Coherence Tomography Images Using Adjacent Frame Correlation Information

Automatic Bifurcation angle calculation in intravascular optical coherence tomography images

Deep Local Global Refinement Network for Stent Analysis in IVOCT Images